More on AB 1634 > GSP Forum > shorthairs.net

shorthairs.net

Welcome to

shorthairs.net

Home

Events

Blogs

GSP Forum

Friday, May 24, 2013

Web Site

Unanswered Active Topics

Forums Search

Forums > Mailing Lists > gsp-l

Subject: More on AB 1634

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author

Messages

missy

User is Offline

MH
Posts:120

06/17/2007 1:50 PM
CROSSPOSTED WITH PERMISSION > From: Sue Matthews > > Here is some interesting data and resources for folks who want to know > more about how the supporters of AB 1634 have skewed the numbers to > try > and justify the bill. There are links in the message to direct to > other > resources for additional information as well. > > Cheers, > Sue > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [dems4pets] Facts regarding Santa Cruz Sheter >> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:11:29 -0000 >> From: oidhreacht >> Reply-To: dems4pets@yahoogroups.com >> To: dems4pets@yahoogroups.com >> >> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 4:33 PM >> Subject: Facts regarding AB1634 and Santa Cruz Shelter >> >> Permission to Cross Post >> >> For months, the supporters of AB 1634 have touted the alleged success >> of the 1995 Santa Cruz County spay/neuter ordinance as a "model" for >> the whole state. They published this widely circulated chart that >> claims the Santa Cruz ordinance led to a 64% reduction in shelter >> intakes. >> > >> HealthyPetAct/SantaCruzStats.pdf>http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/ >> memb >> ers/a40/CA-HealthyPetAct/SantaCruzStats.pdf >> >> Newpapers repeat this claim. It's clear that most of the Assembly >> members believe it. >> >> We don't know where the supporters' data came from, but it isn't >> Santa Cruz County's shelter intakes. >> >> As required under state law, Santa Cruz County has reported their >> shelter stats to the California Department of Health Services, >> Veterinary Public Health Section (CDHS-VPH). >> >> The official data that Santa Cruz County has reported to CDHS-VPH >> doesn't remotely resemble what supporters of AB 1634 have been >> claiming. >> >> The official data Santa Cruz County has reported to CDHS-VPH shows >> that there has been NO IMPROVEMENT in shelter intakes in the years >> following passage of the spay/neuter ordinance. You can see the >> comparison between the supporters' claims and CDHS-VPH shelter data >> here: >> http://saveourdogs.net/>http://saveourdogs.net/ >> >> Additional info is available on the NAIA website >> > 20Graphs2.pdf>http://www.naiaonline.org/pdfs/Big%20Lie%20Graphs2.pdf >> >> Even as shelter intakes have been improving all over California >> >> http://saveourdogs.net/images/ratesgraph.jpg>http://saveourdogs.net/im >> ages/ratesgraph.jpg, progress ground to a halt in Santa Cruz County. >> >> This is one of the most powerful cases against AB 1634: mandatory >> spay/neuter doesn't work. The real data from Santa Cruz County >> destroys the supporters' main argument for AB 1634. The real data >> from Santa Cruz County supports our case, that passage of AB 1634 >> would halt the ongoing progress that has been occurring in California >> shelters over the past three decades. >> >> Make sure EVERYBODY knows this. Put the chart with the Santa Cruz >> data on your website and link to the NAIA report. Make sure >> legislators and their staff know. Make sure news reporters know. We >> cannot afford to have this misrepresentation of the truth go on any >> longer. >> >> Laura Sanborn >> http://saveourdogs.net/

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Forums > Mailing Lists > gsp-l > More on AB 1634

ActiveForums 3.7

Private Message Count

Minimize

You must be logged in to use this module.

Print

UsersOnline

	Membership:
	Latest: hsemaan
	New Today: 1
	New Yesterday: 2
	Overall: 3209

	People Online:
	Visitors: 104
	Members: 2
	Total: 106

Online Now:
01: DuckFever
02: Beats66

Print

Home | Events | Blogs | Photo Gallery | GSP Forum

| |