Welcome to

          shorthairs.net

  Login  Register Saturday, May 25, 2013     
Subject: if you were a judge
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


10/22/2010 10:36 AM  

or maybe you are,

there are 2 dogs that you are considering in front of you,

one has a better gait

and one shows better type

which do you choose and why?

 

 



"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
zodiakgspsUser is Offline
NW PA
MH
MH
Posts:1059


10/22/2010 2:27 PM  
The problem with the question is it is ones interpretation to the standard in answering it. Many would pick a very big moving (ie, LOT of reach and drive) over the latter.....I like a balanced moderate dog, so not extreme in gait nor in build/angle.
That said, if the dog that shows better type moves cleanly, (I will assume here it has no movement flaws) I would probably choose it.
Texas BelleUser is Offline
Austin, TX
MH
MH
Posts:7863


10/22/2010 3:37 PM  
Personally I would pass on both dogs unless the one with type had nice structure and movement too. It is the whole package in my opinion. Gait alone can be deceiving because a dog with problems in the front and rear assembly can still appear to have a nice gait. You have to also look at the angulation, topline, front assembly and rear assembly. Once I am confident I have nice structure and a well balanced dog, then I look at movement. I like to look at the movement from the side, front and rear. Finally, I look at type.

I also have to put my hands on the dog. I have found from stacking many shorthairs, that a well balanced dog will stack and can hold the stack. A dog that is structurally a bit off will often shift a foot to maintain their balance. To be fair here though it is important that the person stacking the dog is not stretching them out or unbalancing the dog during stacking.

IMHO a dog who is not structurally sound will not hold up well hunting, doing agility, obedience or any other performance work. So, structure for performance dogs is more important even from a health and endurance perspective than for a dog that is only going into the show ring. That is why I like to see show dogs doing other performance work. Tells me that dog is the whole package.

I did not mention temperament and personality here as that was not a part of the original question, but that is also a factor I look at too.

Just my two cents.

Bev Quarles, the Pointer Sisters (Belle and Halo), the Outlaw GSP (Johnny Ringo) and the little Princess (Fauna)

Yellow Rose GSPs

 photo FaunaBISJan20110001cropped_resized_zps96af44b6.jpg  photo DSC_0044_cropped_zps0a25f9ff.jpg  photo DSC_0030a_zps3c822a4a.jpg  photo DSC_0016cropped_zpsab533745.jpg

"A dog has the soul of a philosopher." - Plato
DesertRoseKennelUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:1033


10/22/2010 9:30 PM  

Well, let's see - I would throw a quail down in front of each one and see who points first and best!

 This is of course the field trial and hunt test judge opinion, but I don't think that's what you were looking for...

Jean


"Our dogs are bred to be champion hunters who sleep on the bed"
www.desertrosekennel.com
zodiakgspsUser is Offline
NW PA
MH
MH
Posts:1059


10/23/2010 2:53 AM  
LMAO Jean!! OK, I have to agree with you except I would rather not throw the bird in front of the dogs!!
OK, I took her question in it's simplicity with both dogs being equal except one being better moving, one showing better breed type but not extreme in movement (no glaring faults), still comes down to interpretation of the standard IMO to who would pick what.
Many big moving dogs I have seen are a bit over angled for me (my taste, even coming out of GSDS), I like moderate, balanced, clean moving with no extremes in reach nor drive, yet I don't want to see it "waddle" about either.
DesertRoseKennelUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:1033


10/23/2010 7:43 AM  

Agreed, but I haven't seen lots of bushes in show rings to put birds in

My answer was tongue in cheek, mostly. I wil never pretend to be an expert on showing, just isn't my passion. But I do worry that there are dogs in the ring that have forgotten (genetically) what they were meant to do.

Sorry, Francine, I truly didn't mean to hi-jack the thread.

Jean


"Our dogs are bred to be champion hunters who sleep on the bed"
www.desertrosekennel.com
pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


10/27/2010 4:20 AM  
Thanks for the replies.
I lean toward type.
In the example given it is easy for a breed to loose type. It would be a hard call,in the end it depends on what the judge wants to see for the breed in the future.
I don't agree with passing faults for the sake of type,either.


"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
dylandarlingUser is Offline
craryville ny
MH
MH
Posts:75


10/31/2010 2:54 PM  

form and function...

pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


11/01/2010 5:29 AM  
dylandarling,
yep, that's what I figure,too.

functions: show,field,versatile

and each have their own form. Go figure!

This is why I feel so very,very strongly about type.

Francine



"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
JuliaHUser is Offline
Barnesville, GA

Posts:11


11/03/2010 4:50 AM  

I agree with show, field, versatile, but in a different order!

First would be versatility and field. It would be hard to make one of these A and the other B. This is a breed that was bred for both!

Show comes after talent, to me. I have seen many beautiful horses in another world, and have been in the show world, and I have seen what extreme type can do to ability to be what the animal was in their more natural environment. I fear this happening to the beautiful GSP. Would I like to show them?  Absolutely!! BUT, I would not keep a dog that couldn't handle some "roughing it" out in the field.

First they are hunting dogs extraordinaire. Then they are show dogs.

Just my opinion :)

Julia

 

 

 

dylandarlingUser is Offline
craryville ny
MH
MH
Posts:75


11/16/2010 7:00 PM  

over angulated and to long..ugh I hate that...thats the fancy not the hunter

pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


12/22/2010 7:36 AM  
To expand on this a little more -
in the ring a GSP is expected to (over) extend. A working GSP would be wasting energy.


"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
Texas BelleUser is Offline
Austin, TX
MH
MH
Posts:7863


12/22/2010 8:28 AM  
Can you explain what you mean by "in the ring a GSP is expected to overextend"? Do you mean when gated or stacked? In either case, the dog should not be overextending and I would say that if there is one that is overextending it is either being handled poorly or the dog's form is not correct and the handler is trying to hide that fact. A good dog will show beautifully with very little help from the handler, and good form is good form. Form is also much more important in performance competitions or hunting that to conformation as good form will help keep the dog happy and healthy and running for a long time. Frankly, if I had a dog that was not correct in form I 1) would not think of breeding that dog, and 2) would not bother to waste my money in the breed ring just to finish the dog either.

Bev Quarles, the Pointer Sisters (Belle and Halo), the Outlaw GSP (Johnny Ringo) and the little Princess (Fauna)

Yellow Rose GSPs

 photo FaunaBISJan20110001cropped_resized_zps96af44b6.jpg  photo DSC_0044_cropped_zps0a25f9ff.jpg  photo DSC_0030a_zps3c822a4a.jpg  photo DSC_0016cropped_zpsab533745.jpg

"A dog has the soul of a philosopher." - Plato
pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


12/22/2010 9:02 AM  
You don't think most, if not all the top show GSP kennels, breed for an exagerated gait - a dog who flies across the ring? A flying dog will impact harder in the front. A balanced dog is a dog that moves with ease. An exaggerated gait is not balanced.
Our dogs don't hunt with exaggerated gait and would loose endurance if they did.
Bad fronts are bad fronts no matter how pretty a dog looks in the ring.
An exaggerated reach in the trot caused a dog to be off the ground when changing diagonals. The gait causes a faster trot - an unnatural speed for the trot and wasted energy. Dogs in the wild do not trot like dogs in the ring.



"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
Texas BelleUser is Offline
Austin, TX
MH
MH
Posts:7863


12/22/2010 10:30 AM  
I didn't say some don't breed for that, but wrong is wrong. Unfortunately not all judges are good judges of our breed. In fact, the standard says "... movement which is balanced, alertly coordinated and without wasted motion." It goes into much more detail about the front assembly, the rear assembly and also the gait, but the above statement pretty much sums it up. The bottom line is this breed should be balanced and when you look at a shorthair stacked from the side (or most breeds for that matter) you should be able to draw a line across the topline and then drop two lines, one straight down through the shoulder and the other through the hind legs from the point of the buttockes and the line should end up just touching the rear toes. The resulting should be a nice square (not a rectangle). Of course, you also need the right angulation as well, but this should be an easy visual for any judge, but allot do not pay attention to this simple test. Of course it takes more than a nice square dog, it is the whole package, but if judges would use that simple test it would certainly eliminate some of the incorrect shorthairs. Unfortunately, I can only do my breedings to the standard, can't fix what others are doing.

Bev Quarles, the Pointer Sisters (Belle and Halo), the Outlaw GSP (Johnny Ringo) and the little Princess (Fauna)

Yellow Rose GSPs

 photo FaunaBISJan20110001cropped_resized_zps96af44b6.jpg  photo DSC_0044_cropped_zps0a25f9ff.jpg  photo DSC_0030a_zps3c822a4a.jpg  photo DSC_0016cropped_zpsab533745.jpg

"A dog has the soul of a philosopher." - Plato
CathyYakUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:963


01/04/2011 5:54 PM  
Francine,

What shows are you attending that you are getting that opinion? I can tell you my dogs have done fairly well lately and they are moderate. No racing around the ring for me. Except with the new boy who I am convinced is trying to kill me...

Cathy

Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels
Long Island, New York
pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


01/04/2011 6:22 PM  
I don't go to shows. It's what I see in photos and on TV. Both here and in europe.The gait I'm referring to in the ring is not natural - it is man made. Maybe this exaggerated gait is more so in specialty shows?
I do not see this gait at the DKV conformation evaluations. Of course, we are not show folks.


"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
Texas BelleUser is Offline
Austin, TX
MH
MH
Posts:7863


01/05/2011 12:32 AM  

Pixie -  I am not sure what you are referring to when you say a "man made" gait.  The breed standards (taken from the GSPCA website and Georgina Byrne's book) describe the gait as:

US: A smooth lithe gait is essential. It is to be noted that as gait increases from the walk to a faster speed, the legs converge beneath the body. The tendency to single track is desirable. The forelegs reach well ahead as if to pull in the ground without giving the appearance of a hackney gait. The hindquarters drive the back legs smoothly and with great power.

German: Toes not too narrow or too wide apart when moving.

British: Smooth lithe gait essential.  As gait increases from a walk to a faster speed, legs converge beneath the body (single tracking).  Forelegs reach well ahead, effortlessly covering plenty of ground with each stride and followed by hind legs, which give forceful propulsion.

Georgina Byrne's also writes:

"The above descriptions (referring to the breed standards for gait) provide an admirable word picture of GSP movement. Some German breeders assess GSP movement at the canter or gallop. Since such assessment is not possible in the show ring, most GSPs will have their movement assessed at the trot. Many conformation faults will be revealed by this particular gait particularly if the movement is slow enough for the judge to see the dog clearly. Unfortunately, many handlers race around a show ring at high speed, which looks spectacular, but makes the judge's task in focusing on faults very difficult.

Since the GSP performs many of its working tasks at the gallop, its structure and movement should reflect those requirements. Overangulation is probably more of a fault in the breed than underangulation, provided the dog is balanced. An extreme length of trotting stride, like that of the show ring German Sheppard Dog, for example, is, whilst spectacular, not appropriate for the GSP."

 

Here are some pictures from the same book.  In the first, views a and b (the first two profiles) are correct.  In the second the correct views are g and l (the first profile in each line).

scan0002_cropped

scan0003_cropped

I am not sure how you can make a "man made" gait. However, you can use speed as is suggested above to disguise or cover faults which may be what you have observed. A shorthair though with the appropriate gait moved at a nice trot is a beauty to behold and there are plenty of shorthairs in the show ring that do have nice gaits. Also, any shorthair that moves as described and pictured at a trot will also move nicely at faster speeds and will hold up well during a hard day of hunting.
 


Bev Quarles, the Pointer Sisters (Belle and Halo), the Outlaw GSP (Johnny Ringo) and the little Princess (Fauna)

Yellow Rose GSPs

 photo FaunaBISJan20110001cropped_resized_zps96af44b6.jpg  photo DSC_0044_cropped_zps0a25f9ff.jpg  photo DSC_0030a_zps3c822a4a.jpg  photo DSC_0016cropped_zpsab533745.jpg

"A dog has the soul of a philosopher." - Plato
MOOSE1User is Offline
Fruitport, MI
MH
MH
Posts:1789


01/05/2011 6:33 AM  
Maybe Francine means by “man made” as in that breeders are breeding for movement in the show ring versus functionality for the field? I am just guessing here I don’t know for sure! :0)

What I did want to respond to is that all my GSP’s move with the same movement in the ring as they do in the field. Sure they are not “trotting” the entire time in the field but I do see it a lot in the field. So for me I try my best to get the same movement in the ring as I see when they are relaxing and coving a good amount of ground in the field. Does that make sense?

And I also know both my show dogs do this movement effortlessly. Neither of them had to be trained to move this way. They just needed training on being on the leash for the show ring.

Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified
Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested
Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested
Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo
Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II


www.ezydog.com
pixie beeUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:4452


01/05/2011 7:35 AM  
Thank you, guys, for replying. This is all in my effort to become more knowledgable about movement. (it's my secret dream to become formwertrichter-conformation judge)

I am of the understanding that the greater the distance between that point where the pad first encounters the ground and where it passes under the withers, the greater is the effort.
The greater the distance(exaggerated reach) the higher the withers will go up and interfering with foward momentum.
I'm not saying every dog in the ring does this. I have noticed it, tho.
Any thoughts?

Francine


"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>

Forums > General > Showing > if you were a judge



ActiveForums 3.7
 Private Message Count
Minimize
You must be logged in to use this module.
UsersOnline
Membership Membership:
Latest New User Latest: ADAM/REMMY
New Today New Today: 1
New Yesterday New Yesterday: 1
User Count Overall: 3210

People Online People Online:
Visitors Visitors: 101
Members Members: 0
Total Total: 101

Online Now Online Now:
 Print   
Home  |  Events  |  Blogs  |  Photo Gallery  |  GSP Forum
 Terms Of Use | Privacy Statement | WHC DNN Site 
Copyright 2008-2011 by Rick Petersen