|
| Author |
Messages |
|
Hogan Wisconsin
 MH Posts:510


 |
| 08/25/2008 5:03 PM |
|
We had our chapter NAVHDA test this past Saturday, and I witnessed something that is a bit unethical and down right cheating.
A guy that has been a friend of mine for a while was in the running order just in front of me. He had made a few comments earlier in the day that if he could get his pup through the water test (NA test) he would be ok.
He said that he had been struggling with the pup and it did not like water and would only go in about 30% of the time. Well the time came for the water test and I say him pull a hot dog out and started rubbing it on his hands. I made the comment, what are you going to do, chum the water?
He thought that it was a joke.
Needless to say, I did not feel comfortable following him in the running order for fear of picking the bumper that he had rubbed hot dog all over.
Not only did his actions create possible cheating suspicions of everyone that followed, but it was just plain cheating.
I really lost a lot of respect for this guy on Saturday.
So the question is, what would you do? Would you say anything to the guy or report it to anyone?
What is really unfortunate is the pup was not his, he was the trainer and the handler for the test. The owners of the pup were at the test but I don't think that they are aware of this.
The handler also made the comment that he had not fed the pup in 2 days, so this pup probably swam out of starvation. I do realize that it is common place for a dog to not be fed the morning of the test. I also do the same thing with my dogs in order to avoid twisted gut.
What would you do?????????? |
|
|
|
|
Trey SW Iowa
 MH Posts:516

 |
| 08/25/2008 6:25 PM |
|
So the question is, what would you do? Would you say anything to the guy or report it to anyone?
Well, ya just did.
How did his dog do in the water? I have a hard time believing that hot dog smell on a bumper is going to get a pup in the water that truely doesn't like the water, especially the second time, or third time if it is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
Hogan Wisconsin
 MH Posts:510


 |
| 08/25/2008 8:37 PM |
|
Posted By Trey on 08/25/2008 6:25 PM
So the question is, what would you do? Would you say anything to the guy or report it to anyone?
Well, ya just did.
How did his dog do in the water? I have a hard time believing that hot dog smell on a bumper is going to get a pup in the water that truely doesn't like the water, especially the second time, or third time if it is needed.
So are you saying that what he did was ok?
Fortunately this dog was neutered, and somebody is not going to end up with a pup that they THINK came from a prize II sire.
In my opinion cheating is cheating, and I am just glad that the judges did not see the oil slick that the hot dog left in the water, and think that I was the one cheating.
|
|
|
|
|
snips n.ga.
 MH Posts:413


 |
| 08/25/2008 9:17 PM |
|
I do not see the big deal. I am sure there is no rule against it, is there? What is the difference in going in after a bumper, and a bumper that smells good? I never really cared if my dog swam for a bumper or not, just so they would go in after a bird. I used to show dogs in Obedience where they had to pick the article out of several that had your hand scent on it. I used to use weenies all the time to scent my hands. So you would not breed to a dog that goes in the water for a scented dummy? Now, if you gotta rub weenie scent on a bird, that would be bad. I do not believe in withholding feed on a dog for any reason tho. |
|
brenda |
|
|
snips n.ga.
 MH Posts:413


 |
| 08/25/2008 9:17 PM |
|
woops |
|
brenda |
|
|
Hogan Wisconsin
 MH Posts:510


 |
| 08/26/2008 5:15 AM |
|
The test rules state that the handler will be provided with a selection of bumpers. It does not say that the handler can chum the water with food. If the dog will not swim, a bird may be thrown to try and pursuade the pup to swim, but if a bird is used the pup is deducted a point. (hmmmm) Also if the pup is this reluctant to swim, they are usually deducted in the area of cooperation. If cheating had not taken place at this test, this dog would not have prized, instead it received a prize II. I would like to know if I was going to purchase a pup for the purpose of duck hunting, I would like to know if I was going to need to pick up the Oscar Meyers in order to get the dog to retrieve ducks for me. As I stated earlier, this pup received a prize II. This was not a prize II dog. |
|
|
|
|
Trey SW Iowa
 MH Posts:516

 |
| 08/26/2008 5:32 AM |
|
No, I did not say it was OK. It is not. How did the dog do in the water? (what score did it get). |
|
|
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4450


 |
| 08/26/2008 6:42 AM |
|
The guy cheated. Period. He intentionally withheld food and then w/o anyone looking pulled out food for the dog. If it were not cheating he would have no need to hide the food from the judges. Ethics does not always run high amoungst those who see evaluations as competitions and for those with big egos, not to mention that money was envolved. I don't know what I would do b/c in this case the dog is neutered. If he is a trainer /handler for others in the system I would say something to the International office b/c the test results (could be)are false and misleading. If the results are used as a breeding guide it would not be for the better of any breed. Francine |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
r.r.rouse
 MH Posts:106

 |
| 08/26/2008 7:29 AM |
|
First off if these people whom think they need to cheet to pass a dog would spend as much time exposing there pups as they do thinking of ways to slide one by the judges, they wouldn't have to bait the bumpers.
However I would like to get a third party to see what you saw and then , present a what if to the field marshall at said test. The second person is nice when the you said they said starts. The test marshall would be the best witness.
I have heard of some whom ff there pups to asure they will swim. Also broke steady to shot so pup wouldn't not come back after the flush. Good judges will see threw this trickery however . Test records are available to the public. I would never by a pup based only apon a test record. When you see a pup get a prize one on say Sat. and UT test on Sunday think about it .
Don't get hung up on these test results to much. These NA tests are indicators not gaurentees.
In your case Hogan I am glade to hear it didn't mess your pup up in the test.!!!!
Randy |
|
|
|
|
Hogan Wisconsin
 MH Posts:510


 |
| 08/26/2008 9:31 AM |
|
Posted By Trey on 08/26/2008 5:32 AM
No, I did not say it was OK. It is not.
How did the dog do in the water? (what score did it get).
Trey, I am happy to know that we are in agreement that this sort of cheating is not OK.
This pup received a 3 in the water.
I think the thing that bothered me the most about the situation is the lack of trust that I now have for this individual, and the loss of respect.
|
|
|
|
|
Trey SW Iowa
 MH Posts:516

 |
| 08/26/2008 9:43 AM |
|
Hogan, I sent you a pm. My point in my first post was that the hot dogs probably didn't make a difference, and as most of the scent would be on individuals hands, might keep the dog with him. The dog probably would have recieved a three in the water anyway. But, it is still wrong to try to cheat the system, and the breeder,and owner and breed, of a fair assesment of this dog. And more unfair to the pup, to withhold food for two days to try this, if I were the owner I would want to know. I totally understand the loss of trust you are feeling, same thing happened to me a few years ago. But, at least you know about this person now and not three years from now. |
|
|
|
|
snips n.ga.
 MH Posts:413


 |
| 08/26/2008 1:58 PM |
|
I guess the consenses here is it was wrong. Interesting, guess I don't know much about NAVHDA.  |
|
brenda |
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4450


 |
| 08/27/2008 6:22 AM |
|
The throwing of the bumper is supposed to be enough to elicite enough prey drive to get the dog in the water, that and bred in cooperation. The handler has the option to throw a dead bird but this will lower the score. This was not wanted by the handler so he chose to use hidden food. It was sneaky and designed to fool the judges. What really gets me is that he was desperate enough to withhold food for 2 days???? This pup must really not like the water. No fear,likeing and love of water is an essential component of a versatile dog. What drove this pup to swim may not be anything more then hunger. It may be worth finding out if the pup now swims for a thrown bumper that has not been baited. In the natural abilty test I did not give a command to fetch and will not with the new dog. Obeying a command does not show natural ability, IMHO. It all boils down to the reason people participate in NAVHDA. NAVHDA was not created to be competitive. It was created to evaluate trainer/handler and dog and guide them in their progress to becoming a better working team and of the limitaions found in a particular dog and human. Francine |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
Trey SW Iowa
 MH Posts:516

 |
| 08/27/2008 9:55 AM |
|
The throwing of the bumper is supposed to be enough to elicite enough prey drive I have to head out the door and will be gone for a while, but. A bumper hitting the water should be enough to spark a dog that loves the water to swim, prey drive has nothing to do with it, the dog knows it isn't a bird. Once the score is lowered if a bird is needed, is you aren't juding water love anymore, you are juding prey drive. There are plenty of dogs out there that hate the water, but will swim for a bird. Great if all of your waterfowl hunting is where the dog see's what falls and you only shoot singles. But, take that dog and teach it blinds, where it is never seeing anything fall, and the difficulty comes out. Yes, you can do it, but it is much easier with a dog that is as comfortable on water as he is on the land. |
|
|
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4450


 |
| 08/27/2008 11:35 AM |
|
To me, the throwing (movement) of the bumper and the hitting of the water (splashing) should be enough to bring out prey drive. Any movement can cause a dog to enter prey drive, a ball, a bottle, all play is done in prey drive. It is the strength of the drive that gets the dog in the water. IMO. If a dog needs game to enter then it is fair to say that at this time the prey drive is not strong enough. This may change or may not. Doing blinds will really bring out training weaknesses as well as give a window as to what a dog is capable of. This is why I look at a dog's love of searches and not just water love. Any dog that has been properly force fetched coupled with a decent trainer will do blinds. Not every dog in the same circumstances will do searches. The attention span will tend wane if the drive is not strong enough. Especially if the water presents challenges.Telling a dog to do a search of body of water that has no game will tell a lot about how strong the drive,independence,boldness and cooperation is in a dog. Searches in empty water can be trained if the dog has enough prey drive.I have read that the land search transfers to the water but I have seen cases where this isn't true. Just some thoughts that I have. Francine |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
RyanGSP
 MH Posts:430

 |
| 08/27/2008 10:44 PM |
|
| Just another reason not to trust test scores and titles. |
|
|
|
|
Texas Belle Austin, TX
 MH Posts:7844


 |
| 08/28/2008 6:44 AM |
|
I have found this dicussion very interesting even though I do not hunt with my GSPs. I do compete in obedience which requires a retrieve on a flat surface and over a jump (no water). So, I want my GSPs to retrieve anything and have never had a problem whether it is a stick, a bumper, or something else. As a person who grew up around water, I also want my dogs to be strong swimmers. And again I have never had problems getting them excited at a very early age about swimming. Maybe I have just been lucky with my three GSPs, but it seems to me that maybe this guy just hasn't put in quality training time with his dog and/or was very afraid of loosing. In either case I blame the owner/trainer/handler, not the poor dog. I do realize there are some dogs that like water better than others, and I have owned a few of them over my life. But honestly, with allot of patience and positive training, I have always been able to get the dog to go willingly into the water on a retrieve (even my greyhounds would retrieve in water), and enjoy it too. I understand that this test is about ability though, but do you (or are you supposed to) do any kind of training for it prior to testing? I guess I need to go read the rules. Thank you all though for the interesting discourse. |
|
Bev Quarles, the Pointer Sisters (Belle and Halo), the Outlaw GSP (Johnny Ringo) and the little Princess (Fauna)
Yellow Rose GSPs
"A dog has the soul of a philosopher." - Plato |
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4450


 |
| 08/28/2008 8:48 AM |
|
Not all dogs like water. Not all dogs can swim. Some just can't level out and they sink. Some just don't feel comfortable in water to stay there beyond making a retrieve. Some dogs go in for the heck of it and swim not leaving sight of the owner. Some dogs go in for the heck of it and search, leaving the security of the owner. Francine |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
RyanGSP
 MH Posts:430

 |
| 08/28/2008 3:02 PM |
|
I agree some dogs dont like water but I would have to venture and feel really safe saying that there wasnt a proper water introduction done. I know guys with top field trial dogs whos lines are known not to be water dogs and with the proper introduction to water those dogs were crazy about it. Holding food isnt a good way to get a dog into water and I would have to agree with the poster I my views would change about the person as well. |
|
|
|
|
Almost Heaven GSP Springfield, WV
 MH Posts:731


 |
| 08/29/2008 11:04 AM |
|
I would think the "baiting" had little to do with the dog actually entering the water, but holding food is certainly NOT keeping the pups best interest in mind and shows a very poor trainer in my mind. To me, it really wouldn't be so much that the dog swam or not for the hot dog scent, but rather the principle of the matter that in the Trainer/Handlers mind they INTENDED to cheat and disregarded the dogs well being by holding food to make themselves look better as a trainer than they may well be. |
|
Money will buy a fine dog, but only kindness will make him wag his tail.
Bruce Shaffer Almost Heaven GSP's
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.7
|
You must be logged in to use this module.
|
 |
Membership: |
 |
Latest:
wsmmwx |
 |
New Today:
1 |
 |
New Yesterday:
0 |
 |
Overall:
3207 |
 |
People Online: |
 |
Visitors:
116 |
 |
Members:
0 |
 |
Total:
116 |
Online Now:
|
|
|
|
|