All DKs bred in the DKV must pass the breeding requirements. These requirements include fur and water as well as other aspects of versatility. What the dog is used for by the owner matters little. The testing will show,as best a test can, the ability and temperment of a breeding.
Here is the best article I have read describing versatility. There are  articles on the DK and DD and the testing systems that I can not post publically,sorry.
http://www.trader.co.nz/versatiledogs/articles/derjag.htm

For me, it's not about whos dog is better, but whos dog is bred correctly. We can not have perfect dogs, we can have correctly bred dogs,tho.

Briarpatch, a couple of links to several of my dogs...

http://lsgspc.org/Hud.html

http://www.cajunkennels.com/  you'll have to click on "customer's dogs", then FC Slick's Cajun Desire.

However, there is no perfection. Further, I don't show my dogs nor did I say that I did. What I did say was that as breeders we need to pay close attention to the breed standard and try to produce dogs that fall within that standard purely based on conformation. Oversized, undersized, round eyes, etc. won't cut it IMHO.

However, I am far more concerned with those who produce pups and never hunt them or purely put a JH on a dog and actually believe that the dog has proven its muster hunting. Flat is NOT the case.

And, honestly, the few duals who are out there, I have seen so so few that were worth much as hunting dogs it's scary. I can name one dual that is truly worthy of the DUAL title...

http://www.rsaledogs.com/hank.html

Bocephus is an excellent example of a true DUAL dog. Hunted on wild birds each year, placed at the GSPCA Nationals, excellent trial dog, but also has the CH title in very strong competition. Can't say that about many others around.

A big lumbering dog with a show CH and a JH is far from this type of dog.

There are my dogs. I don't want topost other's dogs b/c I do not have permission.

Every dog on here:http://www.nadkc.org/deutsch_kurzhaar_litters.htm

is of TYPE.

I do believe that falls into STYLE,Ryan.
Did yoy read the link Cathy posted?
There can only be one TYPE.
 

Here is the opening sentence to the article:

Breed type encompasses appearance, character, condition, bone structure, temperament, and movement; "breed type is all these things."^Ώ] Breed type also includes a character specific to each breed, a combination of behaviour, temperament and carriage that demonstrate an essence of the breed.^[

^{And the closing :}

The word type may be incorrectly used instead of style to refer to an identifiable 'style of appearance' or 'working style characteristic' of a particular kennel or "dogs of a well established line".^⎘] This terminology is incorrect. The word type in reference to a dog refers specifically to the description of what defines that breed and what makes that breed of dog different from every other breed, as can be found in that breed's written Standard. When comparing dogs of the same breed, you look at type first and foremost, and then you look for different styles of dogs within that breed. The term style refers to characteristics that are different in each dog that already has breed type. There can be a vast variety of styles existing in each breed of dog. These characteristics develop from a breeder's desire to create a distinct 'look' (or style) within their line. Breeders create their own style within their line, being careful not to stray from breed type.