|
| Author |
Messages |
|
MOOSE1 Fruitport, MI
 MH Posts:1789


 |
| 12/24/2008 8:59 AM |
|
Maybe what I will do then is work on getting her ready for the UT test either in the fall (if she learns fast) or the following spring. This way I don't have to retrain anything if I am not allowed to tell her whoa. Are you allowed to leash your dog once the judge sees they are on point and pick them up and move them in another direction? I know there have been a lot of complaints about JH test as well because those dogs that have started their whoa traning tend to loose it during the test and have to be "re trained" so to speak after so many skip JH and go right to SH. I am not FF a 5 month old pup don't worry. I will have a lot of reading and research to do before I even try a FF on a dog let alone our pup! |
|
Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II
www.ezydog.com |
|
|
r.r.rouse
 MH Posts:106

 |
| 12/24/2008 9:39 AM |
|
Moose my intent was not to talk you out of NA testing but to rather give you an idea that the Na test is to give the breeder what information they need to digest in breeding plans for natural ability and to give a handler an idea of what they need to focus on in further training of there young dog. I have witnessed dogs that FAILED TO PASS A NA TEST AND YET RECEIVED A PRIZE 1 IN UTILITY TEST.
Ribons themselves don't make great hunting dogs.
Have a merry X-mass everyone!!!
|
|
|
|
|
bravepoint North Gower, ON Canada
 MH Posts:894


 |
| 12/24/2008 10:04 AM |
|
Moose, I wouldn't not run her in NA because you started some early whoa training. JMO. Gail |
|
Gail, Moka, Avery, Terra & Rayne Bravepoint GSPs
|
|
|
High Voltage
 MH Posts:131

 |
| 12/24/2008 10:51 AM |
|
They are not required to be steady for the NA test so the is no reason to whoa them. I haven't even taught our 6 & 3 year olds whoa but then I don't use a check cord either, so I probably don't know what I'm doing
I think one of the best things you can do is attend a Handlers Clinic. It is suprising what people THINK the judges are looking for and what is really being judged.
I have seen people FF their puppies just to get them to do the swimming part of the NA test, that does not show natural ability to me and I would not want a pup out of one of those dogs.
Just a few rambling thoughts as I wait to go home for Christmas
|
|
|
|
|
Rugergundog Saginaw Michigan USA
 MH Posts:395


 |
| 12/24/2008 11:31 AM |
|
I agree that most are not aware of what is being judged. Training is not being judged. But to say you would not buy a pup who has been FF trained is foolish. True a steady dog is not needed; but to offset set backs in training it can be handly. I have seen dogs that are nearly finished master hunters by 12 months of age. If one has the time, the knowledge and the appropriate pup a handler would be a fool not to train. In fact i would be more likely to buy a pup if i knew the sire or dam was able to demonstrate that extent of training by a young age. |
|
Saginaw Michigan Brittany- Ruger GSP- Kilian |
|
|
MOOSE1 Fruitport, MI
 MH Posts:1789


 |
| 12/24/2008 12:20 PM |
|
Our girl is very very smart. One of the smartes GSP's I have worked with. Which is good. I would rather not have to retrain whoa because she got to bust birds on a test in June when I have put all that time and energy into her. I would rather start at the higher level with her and work to that and get just the UT score. Just my thoughts. Just a lot of stuff to think about and contemplate. |
|
Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II
www.ezydog.com |
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4448


 |
| 12/24/2008 1:40 PM |
|
I don't understand what whoa has to do with bird hunting? Why do you whoa a dog on point? Aside from saying "fetch","drop" and the occasional 'come round, what else is there to say to your dog? Being naturally staunch is cooperation. Training whoa is not cooperation,it is a command. Cooperation ends once a command is given. So, if a judge judges a dog that has ben whoad that judge can not judge cooperation, which is why it is not allowed in NA and only 1 "whoa" is allowed in UT. Whaoing a dog is not the way to encourage staunchness, popping birds is the correct way. In NA a dog is judged on search,search is not altered by formal training, either is pointing. At the time a handler would give a sign of formal training, judgemnet of that dog has stopped,anyway. Having a dog taught not to chase is much more effective then having a dog chase and take up time during the test. Same goes for having a dog that follows an arm signal or a whistle comand. For the water portion of NA I do not say "fetch",many people do. this is wrong in my opinion. Saying "fetch" is a command and cooperation has ended. |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
Trey SW Iowa
 MH Posts:516

 |
| 12/24/2008 4:45 PM |
|
A few quick comments. High V. said she would not want a pup from a parent who had to be ffed to enter the water, and they are out there, not that she wouldn't buy a pup from a ffed dog. This is one way formal training maskes poor or lacking na. The pup comes to the water, swims twice with his tail between his legs and is hating it, everyone there knows what is going on, but the dog swam twice. Anything is allowed (as far as commands) but you will be judged accordingly. If you want to give an arm to move you dog do it, if it is excessive or it makes it impossible to judge the dogs natural range and pattern, they will ask you to stop. "In NA a dog is judged on search,search is not altered by formal training, either is pointing" As far as this comment, many dogs, almost all I have dealt with will shorted their search right after going through steadiness, so yes, it is effected. They do pop back up to where they normally are, but if the trainer f's up. some times not. Also a run off, can be trained through obedience to hunt close, so again formal training can effect search. Pointing is where I see 'formal 'training' effected probably the most, from creeping, to flagging, to no intensity, all caused by someones f'ed up formal training. attend a handlers clinic, I am always amazed at the number of people who have run multiple dogs through many tests and still have no idea what is being, or how it is being judged. Pups look the best when tested young, as soon as they have a four field search, with no formal training, IMO. If you haven't started whoa, you can't go backwards by the dog grabbing a couple of birds, which in the past few years with most chapters using all chuckar really doesn't happen too much, unless it is raining. And, most judging teams will let the dog be collared (quietly walk in a grab the collar) after they have seen enough naturally response to birds flushing. No judge wants to see your pup catching birds, but you would be amazed at the number of dogs that back away when a bird flushed (again, most times caused by 'formal' training). |
|
|
|
|
Rugergundog Saginaw Michigan USA
 MH Posts:395


 |
| 12/24/2008 7:57 PM |
|
What chapter on the west side will you be testing with? I will be prob testing in the spring with my pup in the southwest chapter. |
|
Saginaw Michigan Brittany- Ruger GSP- Kilian |
|
|
MOOSE1 Fruitport, MI
 MH Posts:1789


 |
| 12/24/2008 8:20 PM |
|
I will be testing in the north chapter in Twing Lake. It is 20 min. from my house. I would rather formal train my dog a bit before a NA test than loose my dog on test grounds because they don't have the formal training of at least a "hear" command down. Whoa is used much more than just when pointing a bird. I haven't even used it on a bird at all. To me whoa means "STOP" right where you are at and don't move. Whether it is because a car is coming and the dog is about to step foot in the path of that car or if that dog has locked on point and I say whoa so that way they don't get in harms way when a bird flushes and hunters try to down the bird. Whoa just like heeling has pratical meaning in every day use not just in the field. I also see many people with GSP's around here use it in agility to make sure the dog stops and touches a contact point on equipment. To me when I train I train for the purpouse of the dog doing the command because they want to not because they have to. Which in turn creates them doing what I tell them because they want to cooperate with me as when they cooperate with me it is greatly rewarded. It is all this little stuff that in a way makes me not even care if I test my dog or not. As long as I can take the dog out on a daily basis and hunt in any condition and hunt both upland and waterfowl to me that is the best dog out there. But in the long run if we do ever decide to breed this female I know prospective buyers want to see that testing done. If it weren't that important in their minds I wouldn't do it at all to be honest. But there is the possibility that we may breed her in the future so I feel I have to do the testing to even be considered a good candidate in the eyes of the market. Which in and of itself is an entirly different discussion. |
|
Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II
www.ezydog.com |
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4448


 |
| 12/25/2008 7:46 AM |
|
I agree with what you say,I have seen it. Search is so much more than range,tho. Range, to me is secondary. During the search I look at a dog's use of nose,wind,speed,intelligence in zeroing in on scent,how far they point from game and handler awareness. In pointing you can see if the trainer had a heavy hand (or e-collar.) Using the whoa command when on birds can cause pointing issues.To harsh training methods and the dog looses confidence. On the other hand,the trainer can do eveything correct and the dog still displays behavior as tho harsh training methods were used. I feel so strongly about not using commands during NA and during higher testing, only the comands that are needed to show a dog's obedience. If a command is not allowed at the water in NA then it wouldn't matter if the dog was ff'd or not. A tap on the head is a command. The dog should go solely on the throw of the dummy. I am under the impression that no command is allowed at the water in NA, no whoa is allowed during NA and only 1 whoa is allowed during UT,if the handler chooses. If handlers are giving these commands and the judges are allowing these commands then there is a misunderstanding amoungst judges. I have spoken to several judges and members about this and what I have posted here is what I was told. Handling a dog takes some skill. Maybe handlers ought to be judged as well. |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
Rugergundog Saginaw Michigan USA
 MH Posts:395


 |
| 12/25/2008 9:24 AM |
|
The water is the easiest part of the test as pretty much anything goes.........all the dog has to do is go in to swim depths twice and for the most part come out when you ask him to. The water portion is just confidence to go in trainability if the dog will listen to you. They don't need to bring the bumper back or swim for a set time, nothing. You can give them 30 different commands the judges don't care; just as long as he will swim and not ignore you when you call or whistle him out.
Speaking of whistle you can use a whistle during all portions to call your dog back if you like vs "come". The judges will have you call the dog back a time or two checking the dogs attention and willingness to obey. I use a whistle. |
|
Saginaw Michigan Brittany- Ruger GSP- Kilian |
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4448


 |
| 12/25/2008 10:01 AM |
|
I find this so hard to believe. That in a catagory that is based soley on cooperation a hanlder can given any command as much as they like. Cooperation ends once a command has been given. The judge then needs to judge obedience.
During the track in NA what commands are allowed and how often can a handler give them?
I put my dog 's on a track and say 'search". And during the drag, the only other command I give is "drop", once the dog is sitting next to me.
Are other handlers doing more?
I use a whislte,sparingly, during the field portion but only to show the dog's natural cooperation level and willingness to follow a command.In NA or UT little handling ought to be needed,except in those times when everything just seems to be going wrong, which is when a skillful handler shows what they're made of. I feel that handlers who give comands often should be told to be quiet. is this not true in NAVHDA?
Enquiring minds want to know.
Obviously I put waaaay to much pressure on my dogs. I will not change how I train but it does change the playing level. |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4448


 |
| 12/25/2008 10:10 AM |
|
I re-read Rugergundog's post, a handler can use a command to call the dog back from the water portion and the track? Gosh, have I missed the boat. I thought these catagories were strickly cooperation. Cooperation and obedience are not the same thing. Maybe I should go to a handler's clinic. |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
MOOSE1 Fruitport, MI
 MH Posts:1789


 |
| 12/25/2008 2:37 PM |
|
Cooperation- An act or instance of working or acting together for a common purpose or benefit; joint action. Obedience- The act or practice of obeying; dutiful or submissive compliance. For purpouse of discussion when it comes to dogs how does one figure out the fine line between if the dog is being cooperative and just being obedient? With out dogs being able to talk and understand why we are asking them to do something how do we communicate what we want them to do with out teaching them a command? If the trainer and the dog have good communication and working relationship then the command should be done more out of cooperation than obedience...... at least that is what I think. The way I train (much like a clicker training) the dog recieves a reward for doing what I ask. So we are working together. I really think over all when training even our hunting dogs we can learn a lot from those who train for assistant dogs such as PAWS with a Cause dogs. These dogs are not taught FF they are clicker trained but will fetch ANYTHING any time they are asked. No pinching of ears no forcing of anything. It is all clicker training and reward based training. Just more thoughts to mull over..... |
|
Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II
www.ezydog.com |
|
|
Trey SW Iowa
 MH Posts:516

 |
| 12/25/2008 7:08 PM |
|
"I am under the impression that no command is allowed at the water in NA, no whoa is allowed during NA and only 1 whoa is allowed during UT,if the handler chooses. If handlers are giving these commands and the judges are allowing these commands then there is a misunderstanding amoungst judges. I have spoken to several judges and members about this and what I have posted here is what I was told. Handling a dog takes some skill. Maybe handlers ought to be judged as well. " Any commands are allowed, you will be scored acordingly. Obedience is not being judged at all at any portion of an na test. To get through an na test the dog needs to cooperate. Yes come is needed to leash the pup at the end of each portion. The misunderstanding isn't among the judges it is among handlers and yes you should attend a handlers clinic. You can say whoa as many times as you want to or need to in a ut test, again you will be scored accordingly. In na if you say it the point won't be judged, but I have seen people use it once on trained pups, then the pup points the rest of the birds, again any commands are allowed, the hand of God is not going to strike you down, but it will effect your score, and a 3 or a 2 is always better then a 1 or a 0. Once people grasp that fact, testing becomes much easier. Cooperation and obedience, fine line and one that most stuggle with. When I explain it I say that cooperation is given and obedience is asked for, simple as that. In na a cooperative pup stays in front of the handler searching likely cover (range is not an issue as long as it is not so short is is useless (ie, can I shoot as many birds with a flushing dog?), or the dog is getting lost because it isn't staying in touch and adjusting with terrain and cover, a cooperative pup will let the handler approach it on point (let the hunter join in the hunt) an uncooperative pup will as the handler approaches try to take the bird (not letting hunter share in the hunt), again you have to see this to understand the difference. A cooperative pup will if a bird is caught or shot bring it to hunter to share it, uncooperative pup runs off, or just won't pick up (whole nuther issue). At the water a cooperative pup will bring the bumper back to some degree, uncooperative dogs go get it and run away and drop it or bury it somewhere, same for tracks. "I re-read Rugergundog's post, a handler can use a command to call the dog back from the water portion and the track? Gosh, have I missed the boat. I thought these catagories were strickly cooperation. Cooperation and obedience are not the same thing. Maybe I should go to a handler's clinic." As far at water and track and the cooperation, cooperation has a very low over all index throughout the na test, desire, nose, search, point, are much more important. You can take the most upcooperative pup in the world and with good training and a lot of obedience turn it into a great hunting dog, It won't be fun, and if bred it will turn out more dogs that need a lot of intense training, but again cooperation is low down on the totem pole of the overvall view of a pup. Honestly most pups I like a lot will end up with a 110, with the hit in cooperation. Separating coop. and obedience in a upt or ut test is a little muddier, but the same holds true, obeidience is the dog doing, or not doing what he is told to do, cooperation is giving. You see with some teams a true partnership, the best runs are when the only words said all day are 'fetch' in the field and ds, and 'stay ' and 'fetch' at the retreive portion. It takes a great dog and a good trainer to get it all done in one day, and when it all comes together and the dog is happy with his work and enjoying the day, nothing is more fun to watch happen. Moose, I have never ffed one of my personal dogs (and two of them are VC's), but I start them what I believe is right (well, first I purchase dogs with high natural retreiving instinct), I do ff client dogs because I don't have the same relationship with them. I will say the assistant dogs are never a quarter mile from their handler with a dead duck in their mouth out of site of the handler and have a live one swim past, wonder if the clicker would work then? LOL. |
|
|
|
|
pixie bee
 MH Posts:4448


 |
| 12/25/2008 8:27 PM |
|
Cooperation may be low throughout the NA test but can the water portion and the track be anything but desire and cooperation? A handler should not have to say a word to get their dog in the water. What's the point of the water test if the dog needs a command to enter???? I am very big on cooperation and won't own a dog that is not cooperative.I use the tests to judge where me and my dog are at in training and not for the prize to sell stud fees or litters, I do not chase scores. Yes, if I relied on a clicker to get my dog to jump in a box and retrieve a 10+lb fox to me with a sit and hold I think I would be holding my breath for a very long time or have to bring a pretty big steak as a reward. NOT! |
|
"Time with my dogs clears my mind, renews my faith, and lets me see the world as it is. My only regret loving dogs as I do, is the misery of their early departure." Robert G. Wehle
|
|
|
MOOSE1 Fruitport, MI
 MH Posts:1789


 |
| 12/25/2008 9:21 PM |
|
This probably should be another thread in and of itself but I think you don't understand what all goes into the clicker training method of training dogs. I don't know it fully either so won't say I do but I do understand much of it and use many of the same training methods just with out the clicker itself. I also know many a GSP owner who HAS used clicker training for retrieving and who do hunt upland and waterfowl. Just because you start with clicker training to teach the dog what you are wanting from it doesn't mean that you are always holding that clicker when out in the field. Please before bashing using clicker training for our hunting dogs how about doing some research on it before hand? To each their own in the way they train. I don't say you are wrong so don't tell me my way is either. I appreciate all the different points of view on this board and really have learned a lot from many of you. But I really don't like how many a hunting dog owner is so closed minded to new ways of training. Nothing is more amazing than the bond a therapy dog has with its owner. And until you train a therapy dog you will never understand that. Even if it is a personal therapy dog like we train our personal dogs to be so they can go in childrens classrooms, hospitals and nursing homes. The time and energy it takes to create that bond so the dog trusts you and the situation 100% and can also relay that trust to children and other people is amazing. As you can probably tell I have a very strong passion for therapy work and when I feel one is belittleing the way any therapy dog is trained and saying that it wouldn't work for their hunting dog it does offend me a bit. Not that that was any of your intentions at all and I don't feel it was but please make sure you know what all goes into training such a dog before saying it is hog wash for your hunting partner. |
|
Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II
www.ezydog.com |
|
|
MOOSE1 Fruitport, MI
 MH Posts:1789


 |
| 12/25/2008 9:23 PM |
|
Posted By pixie bee on 12/25/2008 8:27 PM
I use the tests to judge where me and my dog are at in training and not for the prize to sell stud fees or litters, I do not chase scores.
Can you explain to me why you need a test to tell you where you are in your training with your dog? Can't you just go out hunting and it will tell you? I just am asking so I understand where you are coming from is all.
|
|
Rajah-APBT- USUV UMJCH Flying High Rajah-TDI Certified Phoenix-GSP- USJCH UWP GRCH BNJ Shooters Rising Phoenix-CGC Tested Cody- GSP- AKC/CKC CH UKC UWP GRCH Legacyk n Estate Sunray Minor FDJ CGC Tested Tucson-UJJ CH Legacyk FlwrCrk The Old Peublo Rumor-UMJ URO1 GRCH BNJ Rumor Has It-RN RD CGC NA II
www.ezydog.com |
|
|
Texas Belle Austin, TX
 MH Posts:7835


 |
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.7
|
You must be logged in to use this module.
|