Welcome to
shorthairs.net
What was it in 2011? --- On Wed, 4/4/12, Tracy N <gspfreak@aol.com> wrote: From: Tracy N <gspfreak@aol.com>Subject: [gsp-l] Re: [gsp-l] 2012 Point Schedule for GSPsTo: gsp-l@shorthairs.netDate: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 1:13 AM Yes Kim, it will. ----- Reply message -----From: "Kimberly Cyrus" <fourwinds27@msn.com>To: <gsp-l@shorthairs.net>Subject: [gsp-l] 2012 Point Schedule for GSPsDate: Tue, Apr 3, 2012 7:55 pm WOW, How things have changed! I remember showing my bitch back in the early 90's, and it took 14 for a 3pt major! Now it's down to 6! Wondering if it will affect the quality of our champions. Kim From: david.nauer@verizon.comTo: gsp-l@shorthairs.netCC: Mariahgsps@aol.comDate: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:38:21 -0400Subject: RE: [gsp-l] 2012 Point Schedule for GSPs From a Colorado point of view -- they “dragged” us into Texas J -- so our counts are up from our point of view -- when looking at what is up or down remember there was quite a bit of “shuffling” of states also, so a given division may have gone down (or up), but a state with a lower count in 2011 may have been moved to a division that is (relatively) higher, even if that division itself went down also . . . that happened in our case -- we increased by three bitches for a 3 point major -- we likely will not see majors in Bitches in 2012 in Colorado as we didn’t at the count that in 2011 is three lower (except perhaps at our specialty). Why Colorado was put with Texas while all of our surrounding states (inclusive of places like New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, etc) are in a different division still mystifies us. Dave David Nauer Voyager GSPs
From: Tracy N <gspfreak@aol.com>Subject: [gsp-l] Re: [gsp-l] 2012 Point Schedule for GSPsTo: gsp-l@shorthairs.netDate: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 1:13 AM Yes Kim, it will. ----- Reply message -----From: "Kimberly Cyrus" <fourwinds27@msn.com>To: <gsp-l@shorthairs.net>Subject: [gsp-l] 2012 Point Schedule for GSPsDate: Tue, Apr 3, 2012 7:55 pm WOW, How things have changed! I remember showing my bitch back in the early 90's, and it took 14 for a 3pt major! Now it's down to 6! Wondering if it will affect the quality of our champions. Kim From: david.nauer@verizon.comTo: gsp-l@shorthairs.netCC: Mariahgsps@aol.comDate: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:38:21 -0400Subject: RE: [gsp-l] 2012 Point Schedule for GSPs From a Colorado point of view -- they “dragged” us into Texas J -- so our counts are up from our point of view -- when looking at what is up or down remember there was quite a bit of “shuffling” of states also, so a given division may have gone down (or up), but a state with a lower count in 2011 may have been moved to a division that is (relatively) higher, even if that division itself went down also . . . that happened in our case -- we increased by three bitches for a 3 point major -- we likely will not see majors in Bitches in 2012 in Colorado as we didn’t at the count that in 2011 is three lower (except perhaps at our specialty). Why Colorado was put with Texas while all of our surrounding states (inclusive of places like New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, etc) are in a different division still mystifies us. Dave David Nauer Voyager GSPs
From a Colorado point of view -- they “dragged” us into Texas J -- so our counts are up from our point of view -- when looking at what is up or down remember there was quite a bit of “shuffling” of states also, so a given division may have gone down (or up), but a state with a lower count in 2011 may have been moved to a division that is (relatively) higher, even if that division itself went down also . . . that happened in our case -- we increased by three bitches for a 3 point major -- we likely will not see majors in Bitches in 2012 in Colorado as we didn’t at the count that in 2011 is three lower (except perhaps at our specialty).
Why Colorado was put with Texas while all of our surrounding states (inclusive of places like New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, etc) are in a different division still mystifies us.
Dave
David Nauer
Voyager GSPs