|
| Author |
Messages |
|
shomberg2
 MH Posts:120

 |
| 07/19/2007 3:08 PM |
|
|
Hi Jan,
I will be the very first to admit that there are judges with a color bias
and this is not a new practice by any stretch. It is very obvious when a judge
decides that your dog isn't under consideration because of color and I will be
the first person to admit that it offends me greatly when it happens.
The point that I am trying to make is that when a dog isn't awarded on any
given day, it is not ALWAYS because they are solid liver. Having spoken to many,
many judges in more recent years about coloration I have been surprised to have
been told some very eye-opening comments.
I have actually had many judges tell me that years ago, most solid livers
were really lacking in overall quality( poor bone, bad coat, coarse shoulders
and the list goes on) and that they in all honesty, just couldn't
place them in good conscience. And in looking back through old photos from
waaaaay back when, I can see some of the characteristics that they obviously
didn't like and care to reward. That is not to say that all solid livers were
bad dogs because obviously they were not.
In more recent years I have also had judges approach me and tell me that
the overall quality is so far above what it used to be that they have no
reservations about awarding points to a solid liver dog or bitch. I along with a
few other breeders who have produced some exceptional solid livers have been
openly told that they never took liver seriously but.........they do now. And
the numbers seem to attest to that.
Frankly we have absolutely no problem in exhibiting solid livers or
attaining championships on them. I do not say this to be arrogant but I do admit
that I do not feel that we breed mediocre solid livers and we are
extremely proud of those that we have bred and titled as well as a few *top
producers* who were never champions themselves but proved their value in our
breeding program. And we have people who come to us specifically for solid liver
coloration now and that wasn't the case even 10 years ago. People are beginning
to realize that they can win and they do and they are much more willing to
opening their breeding programs to this color than ever before.
When Tina Craig was showing Crayola as a class bitch, she actually
had judges say that "I've never put up solid liver before but I
couldn't deny her". She had many wins under judges who had never done
anything for solid liver GSPs. And there are other breeders who are
breeding and showing lovely solid liver dogs and bitches that DO conform to the
standard and they do win. I just happen to believe that if you work hard
and long and you produce great solid liver dogs, you will be rewarded for it.
And that isn't to say that you won't lose to those few judges who cannot get
past color. It does happen but it isn't anywhere near as bad as it was 20 years
ago. Just ask Jim and June Burns, Marcy Desmond, Barb Booher and Betsy Yates,
Paul & Eleanor Fairchild, Betty Sandberg and the others who bred them
and exhibited them.
In giving the breed seminars my favorite saying that I repeat to all of
those judges attending ( and so does Betsy Yates, who heads up Judge's Ed)
is that "You DON'T necessarily have to like solid liver German
Shorthairs. It may not be your personal preference at all. You don't have to
take it home, feed it and love it and keep it. You DO have to judge it
fairly and equally and realize that if on that day...... it is the best dog
in your ring that conforms to the breed standard, then you cannot deny it based
on color alone and you reward it accordingly".
And please let me say that I do sincerely appreciate all of the comments
and the discussion on this topic and by no means do I dismiss anyone's feelings.
I respect everyone's opinion on the matter and have welcomed varying
thoughts and points of view.
Sharon
Sharon & Steve Dattilio "Shomberg" , AKC
Reg. Breeders of Multiple Best In Show and National Award Winning
GSPs www.ShombergGSP.com
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
|
|
|
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 07/19/2007 4:39 PM |
|
Yes, Even the occasional "solid liver judge", for whom the solid liver entries suddenly come out of the woodwork, and who subsequently ignores ticked or white dogs as much as humanly possible. Paul,
I have seen this mentioned before. I will ask again, who are these judges? I would LOVE to show my dogs to them ! I know of one who will put up a liver if there is a good one there,but only that one judge.
Cathy
-----Original Message-----
From: Unwillyn@aol.com
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 2:20 pm
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Coat color
In a message dated 7/19/07 10:14:04 AM, JimandeeGSP@cs.com writes:
Having exhibited solid livers in conformation "in the day" when they were truly the exception in the ring, I have personally witnessed outstanding liver specimens being "passed over" to an obviously inferior ticked exhibit in recent years.
Jan,
I know you can say the same thing about those "white" entries too !!! ha ha ... We've both seen any number of questionable judging situations over the years, "too big", "too small", "too dark", "too light", and other judge comments that make us bite our tongues.
Yes, Even the occasional "solid liver judge", for whom the solid liver entries suddenly come out of the woodwork, and who subsequently ignores ticked or white dogs as much as humanly possible.
That's why we try to support judges who judge to the "Standard" and have demonstrated that distractions such as light or dark color, who's on the lead, etc., are of little concern in their placements.
But, to be fair, we've also seen exhibitors whining and moaning about their wonderful GSP being dumped by that "ignorant" judge because it was solid liver or some other imagined issue, when in fact, it was simply presented poorly, or moved like a Terrier, or was not very competitive with the rest of the entry.
In other words, we've seen it all !!!
That's why, at the end of the quest, a championship's value must still be evaluated by knowledgeable people who can look past all the nonsense, and see the dog simply for what it is in relationship to the Standard, and how it's pedigree congeals with a prospective mate.
Judges don't have to live with consequences of their actions, but breeders do .......
Paul
UnWillyn German Shorthairs
unwillyn@aol.com
**************************************
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 07/19/2007 5:50 PM |
|
I know of one who will put up a liver if there is a good one there,but only that one judge.
Ok, that looks wrong now that I read it back. I mean just that one judge that s I have heard of another who seems to award liver a lot, but I think that is more awarding the owenr of the dogs, not the dogs due to color as the same owner often wins under that judge with ticked dogs. Obviously NOT that I only know of one judge who will award livers at all ( or how could I have a finished liver ;-) . Just wanted to clarify that. Thanks.
Cathy
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominic and Lynn Pettinato
To: cathyyak@aol.com
Sent: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 6:37 pm
Subject: Fwd: Re: [gsp-l] Coat color
Looks like Dan Mack put up a bunch of liver at the OH specialty! Pluis Davern
owns a Shomberg liver bitch.
Just a couple of ideas coming from the ticky world...
Lynn
Attached Message
| From: |
cathyyak@aol.com |
| To: |
gsp-l@web.whc.net |
| Subject: |
Re: [gsp-l] Coat color |
| Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:31:12 -0400 |
Yes, Even the occasional "solid liver judge", for whom the solid liver entries suddenly come out of the woodwork, and who subsequently ignores ticked or white dogs as much as humanly possible. Paul,
I have seen this mentioned before. I will ask again, who are these judges? I would LOVE to show my dogs to them  ! I know of one who will put up a liver if there is a good one there,but only that one judge.
Cathy
-----Original Message-----
From: Unwillyn@aol.com
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 2:20 pm
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Coat color
In a message dated 7/19/07 10:14:04 AM, JimandeeGSP@cs.com writes:
Having exhibited solid livers in conformation "in the day" when they were truly the exception in the ring, I have personally witnessed outstanding liver specimens being "passed over" to an obviously inferior ticked exhibit in recent years.
Jan,
I know you can say the same thing about those "white" entries too !!! ha ha ... We've both seen any number of questionable judging situations over the years, "too big", "too small", "too dark", "too light", and other judge comments that make us bite our tongues.
Yes, Even the occasional "solid liver judge", for whom the solid liver entries suddenly come out of the woodwork, and who subsequently ignores ticked or white dogs as much as humanly possible.
That's why we try to support judges who judge to the "Standard" and have demonstrated that distractions such as light or dark color, who's on the lead, etc., are of little concern in their placements.
But, to be fair, we've also seen exhibitors whining and moaning about their wonderful GSP being dumped by that "ignorant" judge because it was solid liver or some other imagined issue, when in fact, it was simply presented poorly, or moved like a Terrier, or was not very competitive with the rest of the entry.
In other words, we've seen it all !!!
That's why, at the end of the quest, a championship's value must still be evaluated by knowledgeable people who can look past all the nonsense, and see the dog simply for what it is in relationship to the Standard, and how it's pedigree congeals with a prospective mate.
Judges don't have to live with consequences of their actions, but breeders do .......
Paul
UnWillyn German Shorthairs
unwillyn@aol.com
**************************************
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 07/19/2007 6:32 PM |
|
In a message dated 7/19/2007 8:04:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cathyyak@aol.com writes:
Ok, that
looks wrong now that I read it back. I mean just that one judge that
s I have heard of another who seems to award liver a lot, but I think
that is more awarding the owenr of the dogs, not the dogs due to color as the
same owner often wins under that judge with ticked dogs. Obviously
NOT that I only know of one judge who will award livers at all ( or how could
I have a finished liver ;-) . Just wanted to clarify that.
Thanks.
Sorry for the messy reply. I was on a new lap top and I just
can't type on the thing. I have to find out how to set it up with spell
check asap!
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.7
|
You must be logged in to use this module.
|