Welcome to

          shorthairs.net

  Login  Register Saturday, May 18, 2013     
Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Page 1 of 3123 > >>
Author Messages
chpaisleyUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:82


08/04/2009 1:00 PM  
Subject: Re: President's message current magazine >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people. >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics, >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned! > > Barb > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/ > Sonnenschein Shorthairs > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future" > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine > > >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years, >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game, >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy, >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the >> only measurement we have of our efforts. >> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch >> to another. >> >> Amen >> >> Andi Owens >> Unwillyn GSPs >> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote: >> >>> Letter to the Editor: >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done >>> nothing to solve this problem"!! >>> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog" >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails >>> and letters declaring the same! >>> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the >>> "Board". >>> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could >>> be elaborated upon. >>> >>> Eve Parsons >>> Bleugras >>> >>> >>> ************** >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115) >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> >
rhjohnston9587User is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:44


08/06/2009 5:57 PM  
   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens"
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>


Get free photo software from Windows Live Click here.
CathyYakUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:963


08/06/2009 7:39 PM  
Where've you been Bob?  Haven't seen a good rant for you in quite a while!
 
Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels

German Shorthaired Pointers


Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels
Long Island, New York
calpalmerUser is Offline


Posts:9


08/07/2009 4:58 AM  

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 

 


From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens"
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>


Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target="_new">Click here.

NMK1GSPUser is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:58


08/07/2009 7:47 AM  
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels

-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 
 

From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
 
   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>

Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target=_blank>Click here.
calpalmerUser is Offline


Posts:9


08/07/2009 9:40 AM  

I certainly agree with your last statement.

 


From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of nmk1gsp@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 6:26 AM
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
laceName w:st="on">NorthwoodlaceName> laceType w:st="on">MountainlaceType> Kennels

-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 

 

rhjohnston9587User is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:44


08/07/2009 12:22 PM  
I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, Bob Johnston
 

To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com

While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels

-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 
 

From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
 
   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>

Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009">Click here.


Get free photo software from Windows Live Click here.
cjgalbraithUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:80


08/07/2009 12:43 PM  

Haven’t put my two cents in for a while, so here it is.  I would like to know how many of the field trial folks, who have the big running dogs and own their own horses, actually hunt over their dogs on horseback?   Or is this just a ‘package’ that is bred and trained to compete in field trials and has no other real purpose? 

 

If the field trialers in a club put together the trials, and have a majority rule, then others who have a great hunting dog (as defined in the rules as Gun Dog, vs. All Age) that is titled in the show ring and would like to compete for a Dual have a real uphill battle.  The judge’s panel is often of like-minded folks similar to the majority that hires them, ie., the ideal dog might run past two covey’s on his way to a 3rd that is 3 miles away, and he holds his point on the 3rd covey until his handler gets there.  And quite frankly, it’s not unusual for judges to want to see just as big a run in a Walking Trial, as it is for judges to want a big run in Gun Dog just as they expect in All Age. 

 

 

C.J. Galbraith

Winterburn GSPs

Boulder, CO

Nat'l Int'l UKC AKC CH GDR UnWillyn Firebird SH

Int'l UKC AKC CH BurrDee Winterburn MayaKarma MH

720-470-2759

 

 

 

From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:07 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, Bob Johnston
 


To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com

While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels

-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 

 


From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>


Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009">Click here.

 


Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target="_new">Click here.

ASKMEGSPUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:184


08/07/2009 12:51 PM  

Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show.
I don't think anyone is trying to evaluate hunting instinct at dog shows, rather evaluate the similarity of the exhibits to the breed standard. Proper conformation enhances  the dogs ability  to perform the tasks for which he is bred.

Ann King-Wallace

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert H Johnston
To: gsp-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 2:06 pm
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed! down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, Bob Johnston
 

To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com

While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels

-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer <calpalmer@hughes.net>
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 
 

From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
 
   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>

Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target=_blank>Click here.


Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target=_blank>Click here. =
calpalmerUser is Offline


Posts:9


08/07/2009 12:57 PM  

I don’t know what the % is, I hunt them every trip I can make.  All 5 of them, to the degree their age permits.  FWIW, there is back-pressure in the field trial community against the kind of judging you perceive, and field trial judges are of the homogenous like-mind to which you refer.  A tendency, yes, but not uniformly so.  And my guess is it’s more so in the arid desert regions of the West than other parts, whose habitat encourages bigger runs.  In any case, though, many judges here and elsewhere look for appropriate range from Gun Dogs. 

Cal

 


From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of CJ Galbraith
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:25 AM
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

Haven’t put my two cents in for a while, so here it is.  I would like to know how many of the field trial folks, who have the big running dogs and own their own horses, actually hunt over their dogs on horseback?   Or is this just a ‘package’ that is bred and trained to compete in field trials and has no other real purpose? 

 

If the field trialers in a club put together the trials, and have a majority rule, then others who have a great hunting dog (as defined in the rules as Gun Dog, vs. All Age) that is titled in the show ring and would like to compete for a Dual have a real uphill battle.  The judge’s panel is often of like-minded folks similar to the majority that hires them, ie., the ideal dog might run past two covey’s on his way to a 3rd that is 3 miles away, and he holds his point on the 3rd covey until his handler gets there.  And quite frankly, it’s not unusual for judges to want to see just as big a run in a Walking Trial, as it is for judges to want a big run in Gun Dog just as they expect in All Age. 

 

 

C.J. Galbraith

Winterburn GSPs

Boulder, CO

Nat'l Int'l UKC AKC CH GDR UnWillyn Firebird SH

Int'l UKC AKC CH BurrDee Winterburn MayaKarma MH

720-470-2759

 

 

 

From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:07 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, Bob Johnston
 


To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com

While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
laceName w:st="on">NorthwoodlaceName> laceType w:st="on">MountainlaceType> Kennels

-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

Well pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 

 


From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine

 

   Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
 
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>


Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009">Click here.

 


Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target="_new">Click here.

AdamUser is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:53


08/07/2009 1:18 PM  
So my question is what good is a dog that might be the perfect example of the breed but couldnt find a bird if it hit them in the face? But also bob please explain how a field trial evaluates what the GSP was originally brought over here for to be a versatile dog. Adam Allirun Shorthairs- Home of the Highest Ranked GSP in breed history with a MH title Group Winning,Multiple Group Placing, BISS CH Honey Run's Spittin' Image MH NAII CGC --- On Fri, 8/7/09, askmegsp@aol.com wrote: > From: askmegsp@aol.com > Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net > Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 1:37 PM > > > > Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of > hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the > rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a > dog show.I don't think anyone is trying to > evaluate hunting instinct at dog shows, rather evaluate the > similarity of the exhibits to the breed standard. Proper > conformation enhances  the dogs ability  to > perform the tasks for which he is bred. > > > > Ann King-Wallace > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert H Johnston > > To: gsp-l > > Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 2:06 pm > > Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current > magazine > > > > > > > #yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .hmmessage P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > body.hmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;} > I won't argue with that. I've written many posts > about the falsification of breeding records and the damage > they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding > and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over > the years with the introduction of horseback handling and > especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized > to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt > for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. > I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning > popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair > back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over > and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of > instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field > trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by > visual observation in a dog show. The fact that > some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the > traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have > been genetically handed! >   down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs > that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. > Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, > Bob Johnston > >   > > > > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net > > Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current > magazine > > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400 > > From: nmk1gsp@aol.com > > > > While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to > get lost in some breeding programs along with natural > hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and > Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED > GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I > am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in > field trial pedigrees over the years has helped > the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy > buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at > least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants > GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue > is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks > purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not > live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does > not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live > with it!!!!!!! > > Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed > invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there > is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for > straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, > powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my > point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP > that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability > is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed. > > Carol Chadwick > > 15 Duals and counting > > Northwood Mountain Kennels > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cal Palmer > > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net > > Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am > > Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current > magazine > > > > > > > #yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > p.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > li.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > div.EC_MsoNormal{margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times > New Roman';}#yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > a:link, #yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > span.EC_MsoHyperlink{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > a:visited, #yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalC! >  lass #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 >  span.EC_MsoHyperlinkFollowed{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > p{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times > New Roman';}#yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > span.EC_EmailStyle18{font-family:Verdana;color:blue;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none > none;}#yiv1864243102 > #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 > .ExternalClass > #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 > div.EC_Section1{} > > > > > Well > pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an > unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs > are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal > feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably > not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the > best hunting dogs they have ever owned.  > > > >   > > > > > > > > > > From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net > [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] > On Behalf Of > Robert H Johnston > > Sent: > Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM > > To: gsp-l > > Subject: RE: > [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current > magazine > > > >   > > >    Can > you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually > wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of > GSPs which exemplify the traits > supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, > finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and > intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What > about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling > in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing > Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs > demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by > following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, > the show handlers. > >    Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants > hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just > like the developers of the breed did when they brought the > breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used > by industry, science, the medical field and every agency > that wants to demonstrate that their product > will meet certain specifications. We know better don't > we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether > it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What > about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, > science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would > turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking > about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating > that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good > hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The > foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently > constituted could not be improved. > >    Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of > the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in > favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA > >   > > > From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net > > > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net > > > Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current > magazine > > > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400 > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine > > > > > > > > > >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a > member of the GSPC of Ohio as > > > >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and > specialty show chair for > > > >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership > along with many other people. > > > >After trying to educate the field trialers on > health clearances, ethics, > > > >and proper breeding practices, I was met with > "you are just against field > > > >dogs" and could not in good conscience, > remain involved and help make money > > > >for people who have no desire to see our breed go > in a positive direction > > > >as far as health issues and breeding practices are > concerned! > > > > > > > > Barb > > > > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/ > > > > Sonnenschein Shorthairs > > > > "relive the past, experience the present, > shape the future" > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM > > > > Subject: Re: President's message current > magazine > > > > > > > > > > > >> Well, this has been an "issue" for > more than the President's 15 years, > > > >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I > think the "argument" will > > > >> only resolve itself when field trials become > obsolete, which is > > > >> inevitable :) I too have had many people tell > me that dogs they got > > > >> from me were the best hunting dogs and > companions they had ever owned > > > >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have > never represented my dogs > > > >> to be best suited for field trials, though I > have bred one Dual. I have > > > >> always been more concerned with soundness, > temperament and type than on > > > >> range in the field. My own observations over > the years have led me to > > > >> believe that many, but not all, field > trialers were less concerned with > > > >> correct conformation than the "show > breeders", because their argument > > > >> that form follows function leads them to > believe that a dog's ability to > > > >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout > on horseback or a tracking > > > >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates > soundness and desire. Some > > > >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs > were arguably some of the > > > >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished > and questionably purebred > > > >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and > very short lived. I have always > > > >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of > dogs needing to cover so > > > >> much ground for the modern hunter and was > always dismayed that the Gun > > > >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that > didn't make it. I also hate > > > >> meeting people who comment that they once > owned one, but the breed was > > > >> too hyper for them to live with. The > wonderful thing about our breed > > > >> though is its versatility. We may not all > want to play the same game, > > > >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of > our interests and the dogs > > > >> can bring us together with a wonderful > variety of people. I have > > > >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that > is loved and cherished and > > > >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many > of the showdogs are > > > >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard > condition, and many have no > > > >> hunting skills because they've never even > been exposed to birds (but > > > >> will hunt anything including lizards and > flies). Many of their owners > > > >> are severely restricted by their limited > access to suitable grounds > > > >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, > overall, I think the show > > > >> people I am acquainted with make more of an > effort to breed healthy, > > > >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable > to live with, and versatile > > > >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the > population than the more > > > >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding > is an art and takes true dedication > > > >> of time, money and spirit, and the > willingness to accept continued > > > >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I > don't concern myself with > > > >> people who are breeding for a different > outcome, I do note that many of > > > >> the most influential dogs in the history of > the breed, including the > > > >> field, more closely resembled the current > dogs in the show ring than > > > >> those in the field. There are some dedicated > breeders out there (like > > > >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing > excellent examples of dual > > > >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot > afford the time or cost to > > > >> participate in all areas of performance so we > concentrate on the > > > >> particular activities that we are most likely > to excel at. This does > > > >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type > or ability. Our success in > > > >> our endeavors and the feedback from our > buyers and our peers are the > > > >> only measurement we have of our efforts. > > > >> > > > >> Judges education, breeder education and > ethics, and maintaining the > > > >> right to keep our animals, as well as making > performance events > > > >> available to measure our outcomes, are the > direction that the Board > > > >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, > the cream will rise to > > > >> the top and those who do not find it > rewarding in our breed will switch > > > >> to another. > > > >> > > > >> Amen > > > >> > > > >> Andi Owens > > > >> Unwillyn GSPs > > > >> > > > >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Letter to the Editor: > > > >>> I find it distressing to read the > President's comment in the Journal > > > >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the > showdogs are "...oversized with > > > >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and > most were having problems with > > > >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and > "In my fifteen years we have done > > > >>> nothing to solve this problem"!! > > > >>> > > > >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of > the Pres. and am willing to > > > >>> supply much proof that the "show > dogs" are wonderful hunters and their > > > >>> "scenting skills" are not > lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an > > > >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most > intense hunter", about a "showdog" > > > >>> bought from me several years ago...and I > have many many more e-mails > > > >>> and letters declaring the same! > > > >>> > > > >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it > is still my firm belief that the > > > >>> direction of the Breed both in > conformation and athletic performance > > > >>> should be directed by the Board." I > am not sure of what that means nor > > > >>> infers, but I would suspect that many > longtime breeders feel that the > > > >>> "direction" of the breed lay in > THEIR hands, not in the hands of the > > > >>> "Board". > > > >>> > > > >>> Perhaps further clarification and > explanation of these statements could > > > >>> be elaborated upon. > > > >>> > > > >>> Eve Parsons > > > >>> Bleugras > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> ************** > > > >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See > yours in just 2 easy steps! > > > >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx > > > > >>> > ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115) > > > >> > > > >> > ********************************************************************** > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Get free photo > software from Windows Live Click > here. > > > > > > > > > > Get free photo software from Windows Live Click > here. = >  >
RoggenfeldGSPs1User is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:137


08/07/2009 2:11 PM  
  It seems to me that the field trial people have forgotten that this breed was developed by the Germans who wanted a close ranging dog they could hunt behind on foot through farmers' fields and woods, and still live with them in the house in town.  Germany doesn't have high deserts where the hunters can send their dogs into the next county, while their handlers ride horseback over the countryside looking for them.  If you want a big running dog get an English pointer!  Hunt tests are a much better test of the dogs' natural instincts and trainability for the average hunter than any field trial will ever be.  There are many conformation folks like me who also hunt over our dogs, and sell many of our puppies to homes looking for a GSP sound in both mind and body, and also able to go hunting on the weekends.  This was the ideal the Germans were looking for.
  Just for the fun of it I went through this year's NSS catalog and found that of the 13 entries in the Veterans Classes there were 4 with a JH and 3 with an SH.  The BOB class had 79 entries of which 21 had their JH and 3 had their MH.  Just out of those 2 classes 1/3 of the entries have proved they have the hunting instincts as well as correct conformation.  How many of those field trial dogs could ever get a show point?  Why do you think there are so few duals in our breed?  It isn't because the champions can't hunt, it is because you are asking a conformationally correct dog to break his genetic instincts to do something designed for an English style pointer.   If you want a big running dog get a Pointer.  If you want a great hunting dog you can live with in the house, get a well bred GSP, not something from strictly field trial stock.  And don't think I haven't attended any field trials either.  I was even a trial secretary once.
    Pam Parshall  
    Roggenfeld Shorthairs
   

Adam DeLude wrote:
So my question is what good is a dog that might be the perfect example of the breed but couldnt find a bird if it hit them in the face?

But also bob please explain how a field trial evaluates what the GSP was originally brought over here for to be a versatile dog.


Adam

Allirun Shorthairs-
Home of the Highest Ranked GSP in breed history with a MH title
Group Winning,Multiple Group Placing,
BISS CH Honey Run's Spittin' Image MH NAII CGC



--- On Fri, 8/7/09, askmegsp@aol.com  wrote:

  
From: askmegsp@aol.com 
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 1:37 PM



Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of
hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the
rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a
dog show.I don't think anyone is trying to
evaluate hunting instinct at dog shows, rather evaluate the
similarity of the exhibits to the breed standard. Proper
conformation enhances  the dogs ability  to
perform the tasks for which he is bred. 



Ann King-Wallace



-----Original Message-----

From: Robert H Johnston 

To: gsp-l 

Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 2:06 pm

Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine






#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.hmmessage P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
body.hmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
I won't argue with that. I've written many posts
about the falsification of breeding records and the damage
they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding
and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over
the years with the introduction of horseback handling and
especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized
to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt
for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem.
I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning
popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair
back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over
and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of
instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field
trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by
visual observation in a dog show. The fact that
some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the
traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have
been genetically handed!
   down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs
that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people.
Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely,
Bob Johnston

 



To: gsp-l@web.whc.net

Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine

Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400

From: nmk1gsp@aol.com



While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to
get lost in some breeding programs along with natural
hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and
Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED
GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials.  I
am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in
field trial pedigrees over the years has helped
the GSP breed either.  A huge percent of my puppy
buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at
least at Hunt Test level.  And every puppy buyer wants
GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue
is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks
purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not
live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does
not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live
with it!!!!!!!

Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed
invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there
is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for
straying from what was intended to be a medium sized,
powerfully built, medium range gun dog.  Here's my
point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP
that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability
is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.

Carol Chadwick

15 Duals and counting

Northwood Mountain Kennels



-----Original Message-----

From: Cal Palmer 

To: gsp-l@web.whc.net

Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am

Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine






#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
p.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 
li.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 
div.EC_MsoNormal{margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
New Roman';}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
a:link, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675 
span.EC_MsoHyperlink{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
a:visited, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114 
.ExternalC!
  lass #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
  span.EC_MsoHyperlinkFollowed{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
p{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
New Roman';}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
span.EC_EmailStyle18{font-family:Verdana;color:blue;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none
none;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
div.EC_Section1{}




Well
pointed, Bob.  The preceding posts point out an
unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs
are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal
feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably
not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the
best hunting dogs they have ever owned. 



 









From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net
[mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net]
On Behalf Of
Robert H Johnston

Sent:
Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM

To: gsp-l

Subject: RE:
[gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine



 


   Can
you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually
wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of
GSPs which exemplify the traits
supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking,
finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and
intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What
about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling
in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing
Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs
demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by
following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess,
the show handlers.

   Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants
hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just
like the developers of the breed did when they brought the
breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used
by industry, science, the medical field and every agency
that wants to demonstrate that their product
will meet certain specifications. We know better don't
we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether
it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What
about test flights, time trials, vaccine development,
science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would
turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking
about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating
that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good
hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The
foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently
constituted could not be improved.

   Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of
the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in
favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA

 

    
From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
      
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
      
Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
      
magazine

    
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
      
Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
      
I agree with you 110%! After years of being a
        
member of the GSPC of Ohio as 

    
well as President, Secretary, and Board member and
        
specialty show chair for 

    
10+ years, I resigned from its' membership
        
along with many other people. 

    
After trying to educate the field trialers on
        
health clearances, ethics, 

    
and proper breeding practices, I was met with
        
"you are just against field 

    
dogs" and could not in good conscience,
        
remain involved and help make money 

    
for people who have no desire to see our breed go
        
in a positive direction 

    
as far as health issues and breeding practices are
        
concerned!

    
Barb
        
http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
        
Sonnenschein Shorthairs
        
"relive the past, experience the present,
        
shape the future"

    
----- Original Message ----- 
        
From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" 
        
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
          
Subject: Re: President's message current
        
magazine

    
Well, this has been an "issue" for
          
more than the President's 15 years, 

    
and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I
          
think the "argument" will 

    
only resolve itself when field trials become
          
obsolete, which is 

    
inevitable :) I too have had many people tell
          
me that dogs they got 

    
from me were the best hunting dogs and
          
companions they had ever owned 

    
(most were not first time GSP owners). I have
          
never represented my dogs 

    
to be best suited for field trials, though I
          
have bred one Dual. I have 

    
always been more concerned with soundness,
          
temperament and type than on 

    
range in the field. My own observations over
          
the years have led me to 

    
believe that many, but not all, field
          
trialers were less concerned with 

    
correct conformation than the "show
          
breeders", because their argument 

    
that form follows function leads them to
          
believe that a dog's ability to 

    
run for an hour in the desert, with a scout
          
on horseback or a tracking 

    
collar necessary to locate them, indicates
          
soundness and desire. Some 

    
of the photos I've seen of field dogs
          
were arguably some of the 

    
straightest, most undersized, undernourished
          
and questionably purebred 

    
dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and
          
very short lived. I have always 

    
had trouble understanding the usefulness of
          
dogs needing to cover so 

    
much ground for the modern hunter and was
          
always dismayed that the Gun 

    
Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that
          
didn't make it. I also hate 

    
meeting people who comment that they once
          
owned one, but the breed was 

    
too hyper for them to live with. The
          
wonderful thing about our breed 

    
though is its versatility. We may not all
          
want to play the same game, 

    
but the breed is capable of satisfying all of
          
our interests and the dogs 

    
can bring us together with a wonderful
          
variety of people. I have 

    
dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that
          
is loved and cherished and 

    
appreciated by the people who own them. Many
          
of the showdogs are 

    
lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard
          
condition, and many have no 

    
hunting skills because they've never even
          
been exposed to birds (but 

    
will hunt anything including lizards and
          
flies). Many of their owners 

    
are severely restricted by their limited
          
access to suitable grounds 

    
and/or equipment to work their dogs. But,
          
overall, I think the show 

    
people I am acquainted with make more of an
          
effort to breed healthy, 

    
sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable
          
to live with, and versatile 

    
enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the
          
population than the more 

    
"specialized" field dogs. Breeding
          
is an art and takes true dedication 

    
of time, money and spirit, and the
          
willingness to accept continued 

    
responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I
          
don't concern myself with 

    
people who are breeding for a different
          
outcome, I do note that many of 

    
the most influential dogs in the history of
          
the breed, including the 

    
field, more closely resembled the current
          
dogs in the show ring than 

    
those in the field. There are some dedicated
          
breeders out there (like 

    
the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing
          
excellent examples of dual 

    
champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot
          
afford the time or cost to 

    
participate in all areas of performance so we
          
concentrate on the 

    
particular activities that we are most likely
          
to excel at. This does 

    
not mean the dogs are any less true to type
          
or ability. Our success in 

    
our endeavors and the feedback from our
          
buyers and our peers are the 

    
only measurement we have of our efforts.
          
Judges education, breeder education and
          
ethics, and maintaining the 

    
right to keep our animals, as well as making
          
performance events 

    
available to measure our outcomes, are the
          
direction that the Board 

    
needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise,
          
the cream will rise to 

    
the top and those who do not find it
          
rewarding in our breed will switch 

    
to another.
          
Amen
          
Andi Owens
          
Unwillyn GSPs
          
On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com
          
wrote:

    
Letter to the Editor:
            
I find it distressing to read the
            
President's comment in the Journal 

    
July/August 2009, that he feels the
            
showdogs are "...oversized with 

    
straight fronts, lacking condition and
            
most were having problems with 

    
hunting and scenting skills"!! and
            
"In my fifteen years we have done 

    
nothing to solve this problem"!!
            
I beg to differ with that assumption of
            
the Pres. and am willing to 

    
supply much proof that the "show
            
dogs" are wonderful hunters and their 

    
"scenting skills" are not
            
lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an 

    
e-mail stating , "she is the most
            
intense hunter", about a "showdog" 

    
bought from me several years ago...and I
            
have many many more e-mails 

    
and letters declaring the same!
            
President Blackbourn states, "..it
            
is still my firm belief that the 

    
direction of the Breed both in
            
conformation and athletic performance 

    
should be directed by the Board." I
            
am not sure of what that means nor 

    
infers, but I would suspect that many
            
longtime breeders feel that the 

    
"direction" of the breed lay in
            
THEIR hands, not in the hands of the 

    
"Board".
            
Perhaps further clarification and
            
explanation of these statements could 

    
be elaborated upon.
            
Eve Parsons
            
Bleugras
            
**************
            
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See
            
yours in just 2 easy steps! 

    
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
            
    
?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)

    
**********************************************************************

    





Get free photo
software from Windows Live Click
here.









Get free photo software from Windows Live Click
here. = 
  

    



      


  
Dave QuindtUser is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:41


08/07/2009 2:38 PM  

Pam Parshall wrote:

 

"Germany doesn't have high deserts where the hunters can send their dogs into the next county, while their handlers ride horseback over the countryside looking for them.  If you want a big running dog get an English pointer!"

 

Ironically Pam, England doesn't have high deserts where handlers ride after birddogs either!!!

 

I find it rather bizarre how much GSP folks blabber on about how we've made the breed different from the dogs of "the old country" and then suggest that others in the breed would be better off with English Pointers; a breed that here is radically different than the Pointers of "the old country".  It's the height of hypocrisy.

 

JMO,

Dave

 


Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®. Try it now.
CathyYakUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:963


08/07/2009 3:00 PM  
In a message dated 8/7/2009 4:24:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dlquindt@hotmail.com writes:
I find it rather bizarre how much GSP folks blabber on about how we've made the breed different from the dogs of "the old country" and then suggest that others in the breed would be better off with English Pointers; a breed that here is radically different than the Pointers of "the old country".  It's the height of hypocrisy.
Oh I expect their are far greater heights of hypocrisy. 
 
Are you saying that the founders of the two breeds (English Pointer and the German Shorthaired Pointer) bred them to hunt the same way?  Because one of the most important words in our standard "versatile" does not appear anywhere in the Pointer standard.  They are specialists.  Or are you saying we have not changed the hunting/running style of what it was when the breed came to this country?
 
Pointer:  capable of top speed combined with great stamina. TOP SPEED?  Nothing about speed mentioned in our standard...
GSP:  capable of high performance in field and water - much more to that than running fast for a long time...
 
 
 
Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels

German Shorthaired Pointers


Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels
Long Island, New York
RoggenfeldGSPs1User is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:137


08/07/2009 3:00 PM  
I agree that they are radically different, but that is because of what breeders in this country did to them, not what the English did. (Think American Field.)  Unfortunately the genetics people will have a very hard time developing a test to distinguish between pure GSPs and GSPs crossbred with Pointers for a bigger run, because Pointers are a part of the very early foundations of the development of GSPs, so some of the genetic material from them is still in our breed.
    Pam Parshall
    Roggenfeld Shorthairs

Dave Quindt wrote:

Pam Parshall wrote:

 

"Germany doesn't have high deserts where the hunters can send their dogs into the next county, while their handlers ride horseback over the countryside looking for them.  If you want a big running dog get an English pointer!"

 

Ironically Pam, England doesn't have high deserts where handlers ride after birddogs either!!!

 

I find it rather bizarre how much GSP folks blabber on about how we've made the breed different from the dogs of "the old country" and then suggest that others in the breed would be better off with English Pointers; a breed that here is radically different than the Pointers of "the old country".  It's the height of hypocrisy.

 

JMO,

Dave

 


Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®. N:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_express:082009" target="_new">Try it now.
CathyYakUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:963


08/07/2009 3:13 PM  
In a message dated 8/7/2009 4:46:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, RoggenfeldGSPs@myfairpoint.net writes:
Unfortunately the genetics people will have a very hard time developing a test to distinguish between pure GSPs and GSPs crossbred with Pointers for a bigger run, because Pointers are a part of the very early foundations of the development of GSPs, so some of the genetic material from them is still in our breed.
Does anyone know if this is actually the case?  Pretty much every breed is a composition of foundation breeds.  That doesn't mean we can't tell them apart genetically.  Can they distinguish between GSPs and Foxhounds or Spanish Pointers?  They were also used to found the breed.  Does anyone have data on this?  If not, I will contact the people who market the DNA test and see what they say.
 
Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels

German Shorthaired Pointers


Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels
Long Island, New York
Dave QuindtUser is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:41


08/07/2009 3:34 PM  

Pam Parshall wrote:

 

"I agree that they are radically different, but that is because of what breeders in this country did to them, not what the English did. (Think American Field.)  "

 

Pam,

 

If you were to spend 6 months hunting across the country; starting in Montana in Sept for sharpies, working your way south, east and west, hunting the grouse woods of WI and the piney woods of the southeastern bobwhite and the CRP fields of Kansas and ending up in AZ for scalies, would you be better off with a Pointer bred from American lines or a Pointer imported from England? 

 

What "breeders in this country did to them" is EXACTLY what breeders of working dogs SHOULD do; change the dog to fit the needs of the sportsman.   Seems perfectly logical to me.

 

JMO,

Dave

 

 



Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try Bing now.
stormwyndUser is Offline


Posts:6


08/07/2009 3:35 PM  

Well perhaps that means that pointers as well as GSP have been radically changed for field performance here than they were meant to be in the 'Old Country" There is probably a host of other breeds that fit this bill as well.  Sometimes change is not for the better and goes further than intended.  Sometimes it is wise to admit that mistakes may have been made and then try to fix them instead of rationalizing them.  It doesn't take a whole lot of thought to see the differences in breed type between what the general population calls show stock and field stock. My personal opinion is the show stock shows much more resemblance to their ancestry and just because GSP's were bred for hunting does not mean they cannot compete in breed,agility,obedience as well.  All of todays breeds were started with a specific reason or focus but society has advanced (thank goodness we no longer live in caves) and some of those requirements are no longer in existance.  Does that mean we should stop breeding Dobermans, Rotties, herding dogs and yes hunting dogs?  No!!!! That means we as breeders can just accomplish other things with our dogs while still trying to preserve breed type.

Vicki Eells
stormwynd

CathyYakUser is Offline

MH
MH
Posts:963


08/07/2009 4:03 PM  
In a message dated 8/7/2009 5:19:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dlquindt@hotmail.com writes:
What "breeders in this country did to them" is EXACTLY what breeders of working dogs SHOULD do; change the dog to fit the needs of the sportsman.   Seems perfectly logical to me.
Sportsmen didn't change the GSP to hunt better.  Traillers changed it to trial better.  That is not at all the same thing.
 
Flame suit on.
 
Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels

German Shorthaired Pointers


Cathy Iacopelli
Claddagh Kennels
Long Island, New York
Dave QuindtUser is Offline

SH
SH
Posts:41


08/07/2009 4:09 PM  

Cathy Iacopelli wrote:

 

"Are you saying that the founders of the two breeds (English Pointer and the German Shorthaired Pointer) bred them to hunt the same way?  Because one of the most important words in our standard "versatile" does not appear anywhere in the Pointer standard.  They are specialists.  Or are you saying we have not changed the hunting/running style of what it was when the breed came to this country?"

 

No, I am saying it's hypocritical to tell someone if they want a dog to hunt in a manner different from the way we think GSPs hunted in Europe decades ago they should buy a Pointer, which is also a breed in the US that's radically different from the original dog from England

 

Apparently it's OK that the Pointer has evolved but not ok that the GSP has evolved?  The Labrador Retriever is the most used hunting dog in the US, yet that's a breed that was developed not as a sporting dog but a working dog.  Somehow that's not a problem but hunting a GSP off of horseback or wheeler or truck in the desert or the mesquite of south Texas is some horrible bastardization of the use of the breed?

 

Our perceptions of how dogs are hunted in Europe, both today and when these breeds were developed, is so far from accurate it's not even funny.  If you only hunt your dogs on upland game here in the US, you are using your dog in a RADICALLY different manner than the average GSP in Germany.  Upland bird hunting is not, and has never been, the primary use of the GSP in Germany.  The average GSP in Germany is used for game other than upland birds far more than on upland birds; in fact a rather healthy % of GSPs in Germany will be hunted over 50 days a year, and never see a upland bird!

 

This concept of the "close working, easy going GSP in Germany" is a bunch of B.S.  They breed those dogs to have the heart and desire to chase down wounded big game and to corner and pin wild hogs 4 times their size!  Give me a dog with that much raw desire, and I can show you a dog that's going to RIP IT UP in the field. The hunting style of the German hunter is such where they desire a dog under control when used as a birddog in the field.  That windshield wiper pattern that the Germans want their dogs to run when hunted in those beet fields is more training than breeding.  The concept of the “close working European hunting dog” is pretty absurd considering their walking trials look for dogs to make casts up to 500 meters.  In many of the European walking trials, those dogs run bigger than what would be acceptable in American walking trials.

 

I've seen registered DKs, imported from Germany, who had enough run for horseback trials without any training or development!  Let me pick 20 registered DKs from Germany, and I'll get you dogs running All Age, and producing All Age prospects, in under 3 generations.  Having said that, I have no interest in doing so because I don't want to deal with the personality, temperament and trainability issues that come along with those imports.

 

JMO,

Dave

 



Get your vacation photos on your phone! Click here.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 3123 > >>

Forums > Mailing Lists > gsp-l > [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine



ActiveForums 3.7
 Private Message Count
Minimize
You must be logged in to use this module.
UsersOnline
Membership Membership:
Latest New User Latest: CliffBaill
New Today New Today: 0
New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0
User Count Overall: 3204

People Online People Online:
Visitors Visitors: 121
Members Members: 0
Total Total: 121

Online Now Online Now:
 Print   
Home  |  Events  |  Blogs  |  Photo Gallery  |  GSP Forum
 Terms Of Use | Privacy Statement | WHC DNN Site 
Copyright 2008-2011 by Rick Petersen