|
| Author |
Messages |
|
chpaisley
 MH Posts:82

 |
| 08/04/2009 1:00 PM |
|
Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
>well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
>10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
>After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
>and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
>dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
>for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
>as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
>
> Barb
> http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul & Andrea Owens"
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
>> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
>> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
>> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
>> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
>> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
>> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
>> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
>> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
>> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
>> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
>> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
>> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
>> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
>> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
>> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
>> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
>> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
>> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
>> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
>> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
>> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
>> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
>> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
>> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
>> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
>> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
>> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
>> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
>> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
>> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
>> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
>> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
>> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
>> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
>> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
>> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
>> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
>> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
>> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
>> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
>> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
>> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
>> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
>> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
>> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
>> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
>> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
>> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
>> only measurement we have of our efforts.
>>
>> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
>> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
>> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
>> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
>> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
>> to another.
>>
>> Amen
>>
>> Andi Owens
>> Unwillyn GSPs
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> Letter to the Editor:
>>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
>>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
>>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
>>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
>>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
>>>
>>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
>>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
>>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
>>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
>>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
>>> and letters declaring the same!
>>>
>>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
>>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
>>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
>>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
>>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
>>> "Board".
>>>
>>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
>>> be elaborated upon.
>>>
>>> Eve Parsons
>>> Bleugras
>>>
>>>
>>> **************
>>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
>>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
>>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>>
>> >
|
|
|
|
|
rhjohnston9587
 SH Posts:44

 |
| 08/06/2009 5:57 PM |
|
Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA > From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net > Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400 > > > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine > > > >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as > >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for > >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people. > >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics, > >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field > >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money > >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction > >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned! > > > > Barb > > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/ > > Sonnenschein Shorthairs > > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future" > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM > > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine > > > > > >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years, > >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will > >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is > >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got > >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned > >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs > >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have > >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on > >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to > >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with > >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument > >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to > >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking > >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some > >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the > >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred > >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always > >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so > >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun > >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate > >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was > >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed > >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game, > >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs > >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have > >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and > >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are > >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no > >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but > >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners > >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds > >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show > >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy, > >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile > >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more > >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication > >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued > >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with > >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of > >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the > >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than > >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like > >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual > >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to > >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the > >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does > >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in > >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the > >> only measurement we have of our efforts. > >> > >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the > >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events > >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board > >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to > >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch > >> to another. > >> > >> Amen > >> > >> Andi Owens > >> Unwillyn GSPs > >> > >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote: > >> > >>> Letter to the Editor: > >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal > >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with > >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with > >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done > >>> nothing to solve this problem"!! > >>> > >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to > >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their > >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an > >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog" > >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails > >>> and letters declaring the same! > >>> > >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the > >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance > >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor > >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the > >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the > >>> "Board". > >>> > >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could > >>> be elaborated upon. > >>> > >>> Eve Parsons > >>> Bleugras > >>> > >>> > >>> ************** > >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! > >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx > >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115) > >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >> > >> > >
Get free photo software from Windows Live Click here.
|
|
|
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 08/06/2009 7:39 PM |
|
|
Where've you been Bob? Haven't seen a good rant for you in quite a
while!
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
calpalmer
Posts:9

 |
| 08/07/2009 4:58 AM |
|
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point
out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not
hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers
(many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their
pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
From:
gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009
4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw:
President's message current magazine
Can you believe it!
The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to
promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits
supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing
and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The
NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling
in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies?
Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical
conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess,
the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and
traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did
when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are
used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants
to demonstrate that their product will meet certain
specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog
on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What
about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why
bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just
by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs
possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a
lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently
constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in
field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of
Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show
chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other
people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances,
ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just
against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help
make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive
direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens"
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the
President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the
"argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they
got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever
owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented
my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual.
I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type
than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led
me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less
concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because
their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's
ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a
tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire.
Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably
purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have
always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover
so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that
the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also
hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed
was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our
breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same
game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and
the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and
cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many
have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds
(but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their
owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable
grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the
show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed
healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and
versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the
more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes
true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept
continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern
myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that
many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including
the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring
than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there
(like
> >> the Chandlers)
who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or
cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This
does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our
success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining
the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the
Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise
to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will
switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the
Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are
"...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having
problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen
years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am
willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are
wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in
fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter",
about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more
e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm
belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic
performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what
that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel
that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in
the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these
statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >>
**********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>
Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009"
target="_new">Click here.
|
|
|
|
|
NMK1GSP
 SH Posts:58

 |
| 08/07/2009 7:47 AM |
|
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level. And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>
|
|
|
|
|
calpalmer
Posts:9

 |
| 08/07/2009 9:40 AM |
|
I certainly agree with your last
statement.
From:
gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of nmk1gsp@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 6:26
AM
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw:
President's message current magazine
While I agree that GSP
style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with
natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would
like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC
Field Trials. I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in
field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed
either. A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with
and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level. And every puppy buyer
wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped
with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type &
temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It
does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge
mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides
of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized,
powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my point...ANY BREEDER
not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid
natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
laceName w:st="on">NorthwoodlaceName> laceType
w:st="on">MountainlaceType> Kennels
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding
posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs
are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their
buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that
their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
|
|
|
|
|
rhjohnston9587
 SH Posts:44

 |
| 08/07/2009 12:22 PM |
|
I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, Bob Johnston
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400 From: nmk1gsp@aol.com
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level. And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!! Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed. Carol Chadwick 15 Duals and counting Northwood Mountain Kennels
-----Original Message----- From: Cal Palmer To: gsp-l@web.whc.net Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers. Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved. Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA > From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net > Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400 > > > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine > > > >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as > >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for > >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people. > >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics, > >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field > >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money > >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction > >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned! > > > > Barb > > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/ > > Sonnenschein Shorthairs > > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future" > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM> > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM > > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine > > > > > >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years, > >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will > >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is > >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got > >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned > >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs > >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have > >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on > >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to > >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with > >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument > >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to > >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking > >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some > >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the > >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred > >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always > >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so > >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun > >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate > >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was > >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed > >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game, > >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs > >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have > >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and > >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are > >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no > >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but > >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners > >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds > >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show > >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy, > >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile > >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more > >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication > >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued > >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with > >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of > >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the > >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than > >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like > >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual > >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to > >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the > >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does > >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in > >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the > >> only measurement we have of our efforts. > >> > >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the > >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events > >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board > >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to > >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch > >> to another. > >> > >> Amen > >> > >> Andi Owens > >> Unwillyn GSPs > >> > >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote: > >> > >>> Letter to the Editor: > >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal > >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with > >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with > >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done > >>> nothing to solve this problem"!! > >>> > >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to > >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their > >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an > >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog" > >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails > >>> and letters declaring the same! > >>> > >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the > >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance > >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor > >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the > >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the > >>> "Board". > >>> > >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could > >>> be elaborated upon. > >>> > >>> Eve Parsons > >>> Bleugras > >>> > >>> > >>> ************** > >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! > >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx > >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115) > >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >> > >> > >
Get free photo software from Windows Live Click here.
|
|
|
|
|
cjgalbraith
 MH Posts:80

 |
| 08/07/2009 12:43 PM |
|
Haven’t put my two cents in for a while, so here it
is. I would like to know how many of the field trial folks, who have the
big running dogs and own their own horses, actually hunt over their dogs on
horseback? Or is this just a ‘package’ that is bred and
trained to compete in field trials and has no other real purpose?
If the field trialers in a club put together the trials, and
have a majority rule, then others who have a great hunting dog (as defined in
the rules as Gun Dog, vs. All Age) that is titled in the show ring and would
like to compete for a Dual have a real uphill battle. The judge’s
panel is often of like-minded folks similar to the majority that hires them,
ie., the ideal dog might run past two covey’s on his way to a 3rd
that is 3 miles away, and he holds his point on the 3rd covey until
his handler gets there. And quite frankly, it’s not unusual for
judges to want to see just as big a run in a Walking Trial, as it is for judges
to want a big run in Gun Dog just as they expect in All Age.
C.J. Galbraith
Winterburn GSPs
Boulder, CO
Nat'l Int'l UKC AKC CH GDR UnWillyn Firebird SH
Int'l UKC AKC CH BurrDee Winterburn MayaKarma MH
720-470-2759
From:
gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of Robert
H Johnston
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:07 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
I
won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of
breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend
crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the
years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses,
extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting
dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem.
I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field
trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being
hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of
instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the
rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact
that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled
by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed down and the
fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial
dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them.
Sincerely, Bob Johnston
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some
breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just
wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's
are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I am not convinced that the
HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the
years has helped the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy
buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test
level. And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind
curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks
purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because
they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if
you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge
mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides
of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized,
powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my point...ANY BREEDER
not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid
natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point out an
unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters
themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of
whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the
best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the
Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the
traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding,
pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in
water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving
balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing
Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their
athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those
paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and
traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did
when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are
used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants
to demonstrate that their product will meet certain
specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog
on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What
about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why
bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just
by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs
possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a
lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently
constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in
field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston,
Tacoma WA
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of
Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show
chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other
people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances,
ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just
against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help
make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive
direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the
President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the
"argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they
got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever
owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented
my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual.
I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type
than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led
me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less
concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because
their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's
ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a
tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire.
Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably
purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have
always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover
so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that
the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also
hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the
breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our
breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same
game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and
the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and
cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many
have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds
(but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their
owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the
show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed
healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and
versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the
more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes
true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept
continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern
myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that
many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including
the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring
than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there
(like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples
of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or
cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This
does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our
success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are
the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining
the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the
Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise
to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will
switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com
wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the
Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are
"...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having
problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen
years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am
willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are
wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in
fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter",
about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more
e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm
belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic
performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what
that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel
that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in
the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these
statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >>
**********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>
Get
free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009"
target="_new">Click here.
|
|
|
|
|
ASKMEGSP
 MH Posts:184

 |
| 08/07/2009 12:51 PM |
|
Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. I don't think anyone is trying to evaluate hunting instinct at dog shows, rather evaluate the similarity of the exhibits to the breed standard. Proper conformation enhances the dogs ability to perform the tasks for which he is bred.
Ann King-Wallace
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert H Johnston
To: gsp-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 2:06 pm
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed!
down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely, Bob Johnston
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the years has helped the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test level. And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized, powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer < calpalmer@hughes.net>
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
Can you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants to demonstrate that their product will meet certain specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances, ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the "argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual. I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire. Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds (but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there (like
> >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are "...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter", about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>
Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009" target=_blank>Click here. =
|
|
|
|
|
calpalmer
Posts:9

 |
| 08/07/2009 12:57 PM |
|
I don’t know what the % is, I hunt
them every trip I can make. All 5 of them, to the degree their age
permits. FWIW, there is back-pressure in the field trial community
against the kind of judging you perceive, and field trial judges are
of the homogenous like-mind to which you refer. A tendency,
yes, but not uniformly so. And my guess is it’s more so in the arid
desert regions of the West than other parts, whose habitat encourages bigger
runs. In any case, though, many judges here and elsewhere look for
appropriate range from Gun Dogs.
Cal
From:
gsp-l-request@web.whc.net [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf Of CJ Galbraith
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009
11:25 AM
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw:
President's message current magazine
Haven’t put my
two cents in for a while, so here it is. I would like to know how many of
the field trial folks, who have the big running dogs and own their own horses,
actually hunt over their dogs on horseback? Or is this just a ‘package’
that is bred and trained to compete in field trials and has no other real
purpose?
If the field
trialers in a club put together the trials, and have a majority rule, then
others who have a great hunting dog (as defined in the rules as Gun Dog, vs.
All Age) that is titled in the show ring and would like to compete for a Dual
have a real uphill battle. The judge’s panel is often of
like-minded folks similar to the majority that hires them, ie., the ideal dog
might run past two covey’s on his way to a 3rd that is 3 miles
away, and he holds his point on the 3rd covey until his handler gets
there. And quite frankly, it’s not unusual for judges to want to
see just as big a run in a Walking Trial, as it is for judges to want a big run
in Gun Dog just as they expect in All Age.
C.J. Galbraith
Winterburn GSPs
Boulder,
CO
Nat'l Int'l UKC AKC
CH GDR UnWillyn Firebird SH
Int'l UKC AKC CH
BurrDee Winterburn MayaKarma MH
720-470-2759
From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net
[mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net] On Behalf
Of Robert H Johnston
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009
12:07 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw:
President's message current magazine
I won't argue with that. I've written many posts about the
falsification of breeding records and the damage they have done to the breed. I
do not defend crossbreeding and I know it is common in the field trial
game. Over the years with the introduction of horseback handling and especially
gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized to the point where finding a
good hunting dog that will hunt for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be
a problem. I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning popularity of walking
field trials will bring the Shorthair back to a quality gundog capable of being
hunted over and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of
instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the
rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a dog show. The fact
that some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the traits
instilled by the creators of the breed which have been genetically handed down
and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs that they know are good
trial dogs, the Dual dog people. Unfortunately there aren't that many of them.
Sincerely, Bob Johnston
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to get lost in some
breeding programs along with natural hunting & retrieving ability, I just
wonder if Cal and Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED GSP's
are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I am not convinced that the
HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in field trial pedigrees over the
years has helped the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy
buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at least at Hunt Test
level. And every puppy buyer wants GSP temperament...not what is behind
curtain #2. Our rescue is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks
purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not live with because
they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does not matter how great a bird dog it is if
you can not live with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed invisioned is a huge
mistake for all concerned...and there is more than enough blame on both sides
of the isle for straying from what was intended to be a medium sized,
powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my point...ANY BREEDER
not striving to create a GSP that is purebred and with solid
natural hunting ability is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
laceName w:st="on">NorthwoodlaceName> laceType
w:st="on">MountainlaceType> Kennels
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
Well pointed, Bob. The preceding
posts point out an unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs
are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal feedback from their
buyers (many of whom also are probably not hunters either) for evidence that
their pups are the best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
Can you believe it! The President of the GSP
of America actually wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of
GSPs which exemplify the traits supposedly inherent in the breed, to
wit: seeking, finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and
intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What about Frisbee
chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling in couch potatoing, competing in
agility tests and chasing Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the
dogs demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by following at a
slow trot those paragons of physical prowess, the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants hunting desire and
traits demonstrated in Field Trials just like the developers of the breed did
when they brought the breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are
used by industry, science, the medical field and every agency that wants
to demonstrate that their product will meet certain
specifications. We know better don't we? We can tell just by looking at a dog
on a leash whether it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What
about test flights, time trials, vaccine development, science experiments, why
bother, we can tell how they would turn out without physical demonstration just
by thinking about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating that dogs
possess the characteristics needed to be a good hunting dog, even if they are a
lot of fun. The foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently
constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of the guys I know in
field trialing are definitely not in favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
> From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
>
> Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
>
> >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a member of the GSPC of
Ohio as
> >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and specialty show
chair for
> >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership along with many other
people.
> >After trying to educate the field trialers on health clearances,
ethics,
> >and proper breeding practices, I was met with "you are just
against field
> >dogs" and could not in good conscience, remain involved and help
make money
> >for people who have no desire to see our breed go in a positive
direction
> >as far as health issues and breeding practices are concerned!
> >
> > Barb
> > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
> > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
> > "relive the past, experience the present, shape the future"
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens" <Unwillyn@AOL.COM>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
> >
> >
> >> Well, this has been an "issue" for more than the
President's 15 years,
> >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I think the
"argument" will
> >> only resolve itself when field trials become obsolete, which is
> >> inevitable I too have had many people tell me that dogs they
got
> >> from me were the best hunting dogs and companions they had ever
owned
> >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have never represented
my dogs
> >> to be best suited for field trials, though I have bred one Dual.
I have
> >> always been more concerned with soundness, temperament and type
than on
> >> range in the field. My own observations over the years have led
me to
> >> believe that many, but not all, field trialers were less
concerned with
> >> correct conformation than the "show breeders", because
their argument
> >> that form follows function leads them to believe that a dog's
ability to
> >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout on horseback or a
tracking
> >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates soundness and desire.
Some
> >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs were arguably some of the
> >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished and questionably
purebred
> >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and very short lived. I have
always
> >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of dogs needing to cover
so
> >> much ground for the modern hunter and was always dismayed that
the Gun
> >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that didn't make it. I also
hate
> >> meeting people who comment that they once owned one, but the
breed was
> >> too hyper for them to live with. The wonderful thing about our
breed
> >> though is its versatility. We may not all want to play the same
game,
> >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of our interests and
the dogs
> >> can bring us together with a wonderful variety of people. I have
> >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that is loved and
cherished and
> >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many of the showdogs are
> >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard condition, and many
have no
> >> hunting skills because they've never even been exposed to birds
(but
> >> will hunt anything including lizards and flies). Many of their
owners
> >> are severely restricted by their limited access to suitable
grounds
> >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But, overall, I think the
show
> >> people I am acquainted with make more of an effort to breed
healthy,
> >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable to live with, and
versatile
> >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the population than the
more
> >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding is an art and takes
true dedication
> >> of time, money and spirit, and the willingness to accept
continued
> >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I don't concern
myself with
> >> people who are breeding for a different outcome, I do note that
many of
> >> the most influential dogs in the history of the breed, including
the
> >> field, more closely resembled the current dogs in the show ring
than
> >> those in the field. There are some dedicated breeders out there
(like
> >> the Chandlers)
who are dedicated to producing excellent examples of dual
> >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot afford the time or
cost to
> >> participate in all areas of performance so we concentrate on the
> >> particular activities that we are most likely to excel at. This
does
> >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type or ability. Our
success in
> >> our endeavors and the feedback from our buyers and our peers are
the
> >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
> >>
> >> Judges education, breeder education and ethics, and maintaining
the
> >> right to keep our animals, as well as making performance events
> >> available to measure our outcomes, are the direction that the
Board
> >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise, the cream will rise
to
> >> the top and those who do not find it rewarding in our breed will
switch
> >> to another.
> >>
> >> Amen
> >>
> >> Andi Owens
> >> Unwillyn GSPs
> >>
> >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com
wrote:
> >>
> >>> Letter to the Editor:
> >>> I find it distressing to read the President's comment in the
Journal
> >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the showdogs are
"...oversized with
> >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and most were having
problems with
> >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and "In my fifteen
years we have done
> >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
> >>>
> >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of the Pres. and am
willing to
> >>> supply much proof that the "show dogs" are
wonderful hunters and their
> >>> "scenting skills" are not lost!! This morning, in
fact, I received an
> >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most intense hunter",
about a "showdog"
> >>> bought from me several years ago...and I have many many more
e-mails
> >>> and letters declaring the same!
> >>>
> >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it is still my firm
belief that the
> >>> direction of the Breed both in conformation and athletic
performance
> >>> should be directed by the Board." I am not sure of what
that means nor
> >>> infers, but I would suspect that many longtime breeders feel
that the
> >>> "direction" of the breed lay in THEIR hands, not in
the hands of the
> >>> "Board".
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps further clarification and explanation of these
statements could
> >>> be elaborated upon.
> >>>
> >>> Eve Parsons
> >>> Bleugras
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> **************
> >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
> >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
> >>> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >> >
>
Get free photo software from Windows Live N:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009"
target="_new">Click here.
|
|
|
|
|
Adam
 SH Posts:53

 |
| 08/07/2009 1:18 PM |
|
So my question is what good is a dog that might be the perfect example of the breed but couldnt find a bird if it hit them in the face?
But also bob please explain how a field trial evaluates what the GSP was originally brought over here for to be a versatile dog.
Adam
Allirun Shorthairs-
Home of the Highest Ranked GSP in breed history with a MH title
Group Winning,Multiple Group Placing,
BISS CH Honey Run's Spittin' Image MH NAII CGC
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, askmegsp@aol.com wrote:
> From: askmegsp@aol.com
> Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
> Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 1:37 PM
>
>
>
> Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of
> hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the
> rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a
> dog show.I don't think anyone is trying to
> evaluate hunting instinct at dog shows, rather evaluate the
> similarity of the exhibits to the breed standard. Proper
> conformation enhances the dogs ability to
> perform the tasks for which he is bred.
>
>
>
> Ann King-Wallace
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Robert H Johnston
>
> To: gsp-l
>
> Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 2:06 pm
>
> Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
> magazine
>
>
>
>
>
>
> #yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .hmmessage P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> body.hmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
> I won't argue with that. I've written many posts
> about the falsification of breeding records and the damage
> they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding
> and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over
> the years with the introduction of horseback handling and
> especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized
> to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt
> for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem.
> I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning
> popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair
> back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over
> and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of
> instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field
> trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by
> visual observation in a dog show. The fact that
> some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the
> traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have
> been genetically handed!
> down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs
> that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people.
> Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely,
> Bob Johnston
>
>
>
>
>
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
>
> Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
> magazine
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
>
> From: nmk1gsp@aol.com
>
>
>
> While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to
> get lost in some breeding programs along with natural
> hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and
> Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED
> GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I
> am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in
> field trial pedigrees over the years has helped
> the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy
> buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at
> least at Hunt Test level. And every puppy buyer wants
> GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue
> is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks
> purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not
> live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does
> not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live
> with it!!!!!!!
>
> Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed
> invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there
> is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for
> straying from what was intended to be a medium sized,
> powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my
> point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP
> that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability
> is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
>
> Carol Chadwick
>
> 15 Duals and counting
>
> Northwood Mountain Kennels
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Cal Palmer
>
> To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
>
> Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
>
> Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
> magazine
>
>
>
>
>
>
> #yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> p.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> li.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> div.EC_MsoNormal{margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
> New Roman';}#yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> a:link, #yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> span.EC_MsoHyperlink{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> a:visited, #yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalC!
> lass #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> span.EC_MsoHyperlinkFollowed{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> p{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
> New Roman';}#yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> span.EC_EmailStyle18{font-family:Verdana;color:blue;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none
> none;}#yiv1864243102
> #AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
> .ExternalClass
> #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
> div.EC_Section1{}
>
>
>
>
> Well
> pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point out an
> unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs
> are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal
> feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably
> not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the
> best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net
> [mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net]
> On Behalf Of
> Robert H Johnston
>
> Sent:
> Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
>
> To: gsp-l
>
> Subject: RE:
> [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
> magazine
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Can
> you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually
> wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of
> GSPs which exemplify the traits
> supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking,
> finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and
> intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What
> about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling
> in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing
> Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs
> demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by
> following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess,
> the show handlers.
>
> Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants
> hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just
> like the developers of the breed did when they brought the
> breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used
> by industry, science, the medical field and every agency
> that wants to demonstrate that their product
> will meet certain specifications. We know better don't
> we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether
> it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What
> about test flights, time trials, vaccine development,
> science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would
> turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking
> about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating
> that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good
> hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The
> foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently
> constituted could not be improved.
>
> Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of
> the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in
> favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
>
>
>
> > From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
>
> > To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
>
> > Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
> magazine
>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >I agree with you 110%! After years of being a
> member of the GSPC of Ohio as
>
> > >well as President, Secretary, and Board member and
> specialty show chair for
>
> > >10+ years, I resigned from its' membership
> along with many other people.
>
> > >After trying to educate the field trialers on
> health clearances, ethics,
>
> > >and proper breeding practices, I was met with
> "you are just against field
>
> > >dogs" and could not in good conscience,
> remain involved and help make money
>
> > >for people who have no desire to see our breed go
> in a positive direction
>
> > >as far as health issues and breeding practices are
> concerned!
>
> > >
>
> > > Barb
>
> > > http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
>
> > > Sonnenschein Shorthairs
>
> > > "relive the past, experience the present,
> shape the future"
>
> > > ----- Original Message -----
>
> > > From: "Paul & Andrea Owens"
>
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
>
> > > Subject: Re: President's message current
> magazine
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >> Well, this has been an "issue" for
> more than the President's 15 years,
>
> > >> and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I
> think the "argument" will
>
> > >> only resolve itself when field trials become
> obsolete, which is
>
> > >> inevitable I too have had many people tell
> me that dogs they got
>
> > >> from me were the best hunting dogs and
> companions they had ever owned
>
> > >> (most were not first time GSP owners). I have
> never represented my dogs
>
> > >> to be best suited for field trials, though I
> have bred one Dual. I have
>
> > >> always been more concerned with soundness,
> temperament and type than on
>
> > >> range in the field. My own observations over
> the years have led me to
>
> > >> believe that many, but not all, field
> trialers were less concerned with
>
> > >> correct conformation than the "show
> breeders", because their argument
>
> > >> that form follows function leads them to
> believe that a dog's ability to
>
> > >> run for an hour in the desert, with a scout
> on horseback or a tracking
>
> > >> collar necessary to locate them, indicates
> soundness and desire. Some
>
> > >> of the photos I've seen of field dogs
> were arguably some of the
>
> > >> straightest, most undersized, undernourished
> and questionably purebred
>
> > >> dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and
> very short lived. I have always
>
> > >> had trouble understanding the usefulness of
> dogs needing to cover so
>
> > >> much ground for the modern hunter and was
> always dismayed that the Gun
>
> > >> Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that
> didn't make it. I also hate
>
> > >> meeting people who comment that they once
> owned one, but the breed was
>
> > >> too hyper for them to live with. The
> wonderful thing about our breed
>
> > >> though is its versatility. We may not all
> want to play the same game,
>
> > >> but the breed is capable of satisfying all of
> our interests and the dogs
>
> > >> can bring us together with a wonderful
> variety of people. I have
>
> > >> dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that
> is loved and cherished and
>
> > >> appreciated by the people who own them. Many
> of the showdogs are
>
> > >> lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard
> condition, and many have no
>
> > >> hunting skills because they've never even
> been exposed to birds (but
>
> > >> will hunt anything including lizards and
> flies). Many of their owners
>
> > >> are severely restricted by their limited
> access to suitable grounds
>
> > >> and/or equipment to work their dogs. But,
> overall, I think the show
>
> > >> people I am acquainted with make more of an
> effort to breed healthy,
>
> > >> sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable
> to live with, and versatile
>
> > >> enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the
> population than the more
>
> > >> "specialized" field dogs. Breeding
> is an art and takes true dedication
>
> > >> of time, money and spirit, and the
> willingness to accept continued
>
> > >> responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I
> don't concern myself with
>
> > >> people who are breeding for a different
> outcome, I do note that many of
>
> > >> the most influential dogs in the history of
> the breed, including the
>
> > >> field, more closely resembled the current
> dogs in the show ring than
>
> > >> those in the field. There are some dedicated
> breeders out there (like
>
> > >> the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing
> excellent examples of dual
>
> > >> champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot
> afford the time or cost to
>
> > >> participate in all areas of performance so we
> concentrate on the
>
> > >> particular activities that we are most likely
> to excel at. This does
>
> > >> not mean the dogs are any less true to type
> or ability. Our success in
>
> > >> our endeavors and the feedback from our
> buyers and our peers are the
>
> > >> only measurement we have of our efforts.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Judges education, breeder education and
> ethics, and maintaining the
>
> > >> right to keep our animals, as well as making
> performance events
>
> > >> available to measure our outcomes, are the
> direction that the Board
>
> > >> needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise,
> the cream will rise to
>
> > >> the top and those who do not find it
> rewarding in our breed will switch
>
> > >> to another.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Amen
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Andi Owens
>
> > >> Unwillyn GSPs
>
> > >>
>
> > >> On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com
> wrote:
>
> > >>
>
> > >>> Letter to the Editor:
>
> > >>> I find it distressing to read the
> President's comment in the Journal
>
> > >>> July/August 2009, that he feels the
> showdogs are "...oversized with
>
> > >>> straight fronts, lacking condition and
> most were having problems with
>
> > >>> hunting and scenting skills"!! and
> "In my fifteen years we have done
>
> > >>> nothing to solve this problem"!!
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> I beg to differ with that assumption of
> the Pres. and am willing to
>
> > >>> supply much proof that the "show
> dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
>
> > >>> "scenting skills" are not
> lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
>
> > >>> e-mail stating , "she is the most
> intense hunter", about a "showdog"
>
> > >>> bought from me several years ago...and I
> have many many more e-mails
>
> > >>> and letters declaring the same!
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> President Blackbourn states, "..it
> is still my firm belief that the
>
> > >>> direction of the Breed both in
> conformation and athletic performance
>
> > >>> should be directed by the Board." I
> am not sure of what that means nor
>
> > >>> infers, but I would suspect that many
> longtime breeders feel that the
>
> > >>> "direction" of the breed lay in
> THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
>
> > >>> "Board".
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> Perhaps further clarification and
> explanation of these statements could
>
> > >>> be elaborated upon.
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> Eve Parsons
>
> > >>> Bleugras
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> **************
>
> > >>> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See
> yours in just 2 easy steps!
>
> > >>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
>
>
> > >>>
> ?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
> **********************************************************************
>
> > >>
>
> > >> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get free photo
> software from Windows Live Click
> here.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Get free photo software from Windows Live Click
> here. =
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
RoggenfeldGSPs1
 MH Posts:137

 |
| 08/07/2009 2:11 PM |
|
It seems to me that the field trial people have forgotten that this
breed was developed by the Germans who wanted a close ranging dog they
could hunt behind on foot through farmers' fields and woods, and still
live with them in the house in town. Germany doesn't have high deserts
where the hunters can send their dogs into the next county, while their
handlers ride horseback over the countryside looking for them. If you
want a big running dog get an English pointer! Hunt tests are a much
better test of the dogs' natural instincts and trainability for the
average hunter than any field trial will ever be. There are many
conformation folks like me who also hunt over our dogs, and sell many
of our puppies to homes looking for a GSP sound in both mind and body,
and also able to go hunting on the weekends. This was the ideal the
Germans were looking for.
Just for the fun of it I went through this year's NSS catalog and
found that of the 13 entries in the Veterans Classes there were 4 with
a JH and 3 with an SH. The BOB class had 79 entries of which 21 had
their JH and 3 had their MH. Just out of those 2 classes 1/3 of the
entries have proved they have the hunting instincts as well as correct
conformation. How many of those field trial dogs could ever get a show
point? Why do you think there are so few duals in our breed? It isn't
because the champions can't hunt, it is because you are asking a
conformationally correct dog to break his genetic instincts to do
something designed for an English style pointer. If you want a big
running dog get a Pointer. If you want a great hunting dog you can
live with in the house, get a well bred GSP, not something from
strictly field trial stock. And don't think I haven't attended any
field trials either. I was even a trial secretary once.
Pam Parshall
Roggenfeld Shorthairs
Adam DeLude wrote:
So my question is what good is a dog that might be the perfect example of the breed but couldnt find a bird if it hit them in the face?
But also bob please explain how a field trial evaluates what the GSP was originally brought over here for to be a versatile dog.
Adam
Allirun Shorthairs-
Home of the Highest Ranked GSP in breed history with a MH title
Group Winning,Multiple Group Placing,
BISS CH Honey Run's Spittin' Image MH NAII CGC
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, askmegsp@aol.com wrote:
From: askmegsp@aol.com
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current magazine
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 1:37 PM
Still, the evaluation of instinctive traits of
hunting dogs should be done in field trials, where the
rubber hits the road, rather than by visual observation in a
dog show.I don't think anyone is trying to
evaluate hunting instinct at dog shows, rather evaluate the
similarity of the exhibits to the breed standard. Proper
conformation enhances the dogs ability to
perform the tasks for which he is bred.
Ann King-Wallace
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert H Johnston
To: gsp-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 2:06 pm
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine
#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.hmmessage P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
body.hmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
I won't argue with that. I've written many posts
about the falsification of breeding records and the damage
they have done to the breed. I do not defend crossbreeding
and I know it is common in the field trial game. Over
the years with the introduction of horseback handling and
especially gaited horses, extended range has been emphasized
to the point where finding a good hunting dog that will hunt
for a foot hunter from field trial stock can be a problem.
I'm hoping that DNA testing and the burgeoning
popularity of walking field trials will bring the Shorthair
back to a quality gundog capable of being hunted over
and handled by a foot hunter. Still, the evaluation of
instinctive traits of hunting dogs should be done in field
trials, where the rubber hits the road, rather than by
visual observation in a dog show. The fact that
some show dogs are good hunting dogs is due to the
traits instilled by the creators of the breed which have
been genetically handed!
down and the fact that some people work hard to show dogs
that they know are good trial dogs, the Dual dog people.
Unfortunately there aren't that many of them. Sincerely,
Bob Johnston
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: Re: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:26:04 -0400
From: nmk1gsp@aol.com
While I agree that GSP style, stamina and desire seem to
get lost in some breeding programs along with natural
hunting & retrieving ability, I just wonder if Cal and
Bob would like to guess what the percent of PUREBRED
GSP's are currently running in AKC Field Trials. I
am not convinced that the HUGE influx of Pointer DNA in
field trial pedigrees over the years has helped
the GSP breed either. A huge percent of my puppy
buyers either want a dog to hunt with and or compete with at
least at Hunt Test level. And every puppy buyer wants
GSP temperament...not what is behind curtain #2. Our rescue
is swamped with cross breeds that unsuspecting folks
purchased expecting GSP type & temperament and could not
live with because they are NOT purebred GSP's. It does
not matter how great a bird dog it is if you can not live
with it!!!!!!!
Not breeding for what our forefathers in this breed
invisioned is a huge mistake for all concerned...and there
is more than enough blame on both sides of the isle for
straying from what was intended to be a medium sized,
powerfully built, medium range gun dog. Here's my
point...ANY BREEDER not striving to create a GSP
that is purebred and with solid natural hunting ability
is NOT doing any of us a favor or our Breed.
Carol Chadwick
15 Duals and counting
Northwood Mountain Kennels
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Palmer
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2009 3:22 am
Subject: RE: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine
#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
p.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
li.EC_MsoNormal, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
div.EC_MsoNormal{margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
New Roman';}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
a:link, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
span.EC_MsoHyperlink{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
a:visited, #yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalC!
lass #EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
span.EC_MsoHyperlinkFollowed{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
p{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
New Roman';}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
span.EC_EmailStyle18{font-family:Verdana;color:blue;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none
none;}#yiv1864243102
#AOLMsgPart_2_9bfabfdb-6cdc-4bca-9111-048522e49114
.ExternalClass
#EC_AOLMsgPart_2_710fe8b9-ffff-4a15-9810-4accd0379675
div.EC_Section1{}
Well
pointed, Bob. The preceding posts point out an
unfortunate fact these days that so many breeders of GSPs
are not hunters themselves, and instead rely on anecdotal
feedback from their buyers (many of whom also are probably
not hunters either) for evidence that their pups are the
best hunting dogs they have ever owned.
From: gsp-l-request@web.whc.net
[mailto:gsp-l-request@web.whc.net]
On Behalf Of
Robert H Johnston
Sent:
Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:38 PM
To: gsp-l
Subject: RE:
[gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine
Can
you believe it! The President of the GSP of America actually
wants the Board of Directors to promulgate the breeding of
GSPs which exemplify the traits
supposedly inherent in the breed, to wit: seeking,
finding, pointing and retrieving game birds with style and
intensity on land and in water. The NERVE of the guy. What
about Frisbee chasing, hurdling, retrieving balls, excelling
in couch potatoing, competing in agility tests and chasing
Geckos and Flies? Lets not forget Shows where the dogs
demonstrate their athleticism and physical conditioning by
following at a slow trot those paragons of physical prowess,
the show handlers.
Even worse, the Prez (Dolt that he is) wants
hunting desire and traits demonstrated in Field Trials just
like the developers of the breed did when they brought the
breed into existence. Never mind that Field trials are used
by industry, science, the medical field and every agency
that wants to demonstrate that their product
will meet certain specifications. We know better don't
we? We can tell just by looking at a dog on a leash whether
it wants to hunt and can perform to a standard. What
about test flights, time trials, vaccine development,
science experiments, why bother, we can tell how they would
turn out without physical demonstration just by thinking
about it. Get real, shows are worthless for demonstrating
that dogs possess the characteristics needed to be a good
hunting dog, even if they are a lot of fun. The
foregoing is not to say that Field trials as presently
constituted could not be improved.
Finally, there are areas of agreement, most of
the guys I know in field trialing are definitely not in
favor of straight fronts. Bob Johnston, Tacoma WA
From: chpaisley@sbcglobal.net
To: gsp-l@web.whc.net
Subject: [gsp-l] Fw: President's message current
magazine
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:46:20 -0400
Subject: Re: President's message current magazine
I agree with you 110%! After years of being a
member of the GSPC of Ohio as
well as President, Secretary, and Board member and
specialty show chair for
10+ years, I resigned from its' membership
along with many other people.
After trying to educate the field trialers on
health clearances, ethics,
and proper breeding practices, I was met with
"you are just against field
dogs" and could not in good conscience,
remain involved and help make money
for people who have no desire to see our breed go
in a positive direction
as far as health issues and breeding practices are
concerned!
Barb
http://sonnenscheinshorthairs.tripod.com/
Sonnenschein Shorthairs
"relive the past, experience the present,
shape the future"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul & Andrea Owens"
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: President's message current
magazine
Well, this has been an "issue" for
more than the President's 15 years,
and more than my 35+ years in the breed. I
think the "argument" will
only resolve itself when field trials become
obsolete, which is
inevitable I too have had many people tell
me that dogs they got
from me were the best hunting dogs and
companions they had ever owned
(most were not first time GSP owners). I have
never represented my dogs
to be best suited for field trials, though I
have bred one Dual. I have
always been more concerned with soundness,
temperament and type than on
range in the field. My own observations over
the years have led me to
believe that many, but not all, field
trialers were less concerned with
correct conformation than the "show
breeders", because their argument
that form follows function leads them to
believe that a dog's ability to
run for an hour in the desert, with a scout
on horseback or a tracking
collar necessary to locate them, indicates
soundness and desire. Some
of the photos I've seen of field dogs
were arguably some of the
straightest, most undersized, undernourished
and questionably purebred
dogs I've ever seen, with bad bites and
very short lived. I have always
had trouble understanding the usefulness of
dogs needing to cover so
much ground for the modern hunter and was
always dismayed that the Gun
Dogs seemed to be just All Age dogs that
didn't make it. I also hate
meeting people who comment that they once
owned one, but the breed was
too hyper for them to live with. The
wonderful thing about our breed
though is its versatility. We may not all
want to play the same game,
but the breed is capable of satisfying all of
our interests and the dogs
can bring us together with a wonderful
variety of people. I have
dedicated myself to perpetuating a breed that
is loved and cherished and
appreciated by the people who own them. Many
of the showdogs are
lacking in fronts, some are not in good hard
condition, and many have no
hunting skills because they've never even
been exposed to birds (but
will hunt anything including lizards and
flies). Many of their owners
are severely restricted by their limited
access to suitable grounds
and/or equipment to work their dogs. But,
overall, I think the show
people I am acquainted with make more of an
effort to breed healthy,
sound, calm dogs that are easy and enjoyable
to live with, and versatile
enough to satisfy a larger proportion of the
population than the more
"specialized" field dogs. Breeding
is an art and takes true dedication
of time, money and spirit, and the
willingness to accept continued
responsibility for the dogs we breed. While I
don't concern myself with
people who are breeding for a different
outcome, I do note that many of
the most influential dogs in the history of
the breed, including the
field, more closely resembled the current
dogs in the show ring than
those in the field. There are some dedicated
breeders out there (like
the Chandlers) who are dedicated to producing
excellent examples of dual
champions. Unfortunately, many of us cannot
afford the time or cost to
participate in all areas of performance so we
concentrate on the
particular activities that we are most likely
to excel at. This does
not mean the dogs are any less true to type
or ability. Our success in
our endeavors and the feedback from our
buyers and our peers are the
only measurement we have of our efforts.
Judges education, breeder education and
ethics, and maintaining the
right to keep our animals, as well as making
performance events
available to measure our outcomes, are the
direction that the Board
needs to concern itself with most. Otherwise,
the cream will rise to
the top and those who do not find it
rewarding in our breed will switch
to another.
Amen
Andi Owens
Unwillyn GSPs
On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:03 AM, bleugrasgsp@aol.com
wrote:
Letter to the Editor:
I find it distressing to read the
President's comment in the Journal
July/August 2009, that he feels the
showdogs are "...oversized with
straight fronts, lacking condition and
most were having problems with
hunting and scenting skills"!! and
"In my fifteen years we have done
nothing to solve this problem"!!
I beg to differ with that assumption of
the Pres. and am willing to
supply much proof that the "show
dogs" are wonderful hunters and their
"scenting skills" are not
lost!! This morning, in fact, I received an
e-mail stating , "she is the most
intense hunter", about a "showdog"
bought from me several years ago...and I
have many many more e-mails
and letters declaring the same!
President Blackbourn states, "..it
is still my firm belief that the
direction of the Breed both in
conformation and athletic performance
should be directed by the Board." I
am not sure of what that means nor
infers, but I would suspect that many
longtime breeders feel that the
"direction" of the breed lay in
THEIR hands, not in the hands of the
"Board".
Perhaps further clarification and
explanation of these statements could
be elaborated upon.
Eve Parsons
Bleugras
**************
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See
yours in just 2 easy steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222846709x1201493018/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx
?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd=JulystepsfooterNO115)
**********************************************************************
Get free photo
software from Windows Live Click
here.
Get free photo software from Windows Live Click
here. =
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Quindt
 SH Posts:41

 |
| 08/07/2009 2:38 PM |
|
|
Pam Parshall wrote:
"Germany doesn't have high deserts where the hunters can send their dogs into the next county, while their handlers ride horseback over the countryside looking for them. If you want a big running dog get an English pointer!"
Ironically Pam, England doesn't have high deserts where handlers ride after birddogs either!!!
I find it rather bizarre how much GSP folks blabber on about how we've made the breed different from the dogs of "the old country" and then suggest that others in the breed would be better off with English Pointers; a breed that here is radically different than the Pointers of "the old country". It's the height of hypocrisy.
JMO,
Dave
Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®. Try it now.
|
|
|
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 08/07/2009 3:00 PM |
|
In a message dated 8/7/2009 4:24:15 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
dlquindt@hotmail.com writes:
I
find it rather bizarre how much GSP folks blabber on about how we've made the
breed different from the dogs of "the old country" and then suggest that
others in the breed would be better off with English Pointers; a breed that
here is radically different than the Pointers of "the old country".
It's the height of hypocrisy.
Oh I expect their are far greater heights of hypocrisy.
Are you saying that the founders of the two breeds (English Pointer and the
German Shorthaired Pointer) bred them to hunt the same way? Because one of
the most important words in our standard "versatile" does not appear anywhere in
the Pointer standard. They are specialists. Or are you saying we
have not changed the hunting/running style of what it was when the breed came to
this country?
Pointer: capable of top speed combined with great stamina. TOP
SPEED? Nothing about speed mentioned in our standard...
GSP: capable of high performance in field and water - much more to
that than running fast for a long time...
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
RoggenfeldGSPs1
 MH Posts:137

 |
| 08/07/2009 3:00 PM |
|
I agree that they are radically different, but that is because of what
breeders in this country did to them, not what the English did. (Think
American Field.) Unfortunately the genetics people will have a very
hard time developing a test to distinguish between pure GSPs and GSPs
crossbred with Pointers for a bigger run, because Pointers are a part
of the very early foundations of the development of GSPs, so some of
the genetic material from them is still in our breed.
Pam Parshall
Roggenfeld Shorthairs
Dave Quindt wrote:
Pam
Parshall wrote:
"Germany
doesn't have high deserts where the hunters can send their dogs into
the next county, while their handlers ride horseback over the
countryside looking for them. If you want a big running dog get an
English pointer!"
Ironically
Pam, England doesn't have high
deserts where handlers ride after birddogs either!!!
I
find it rather bizarre how much GSP folks blabber on about how we've
made the breed different from the dogs of "the old country" and then
suggest that others in the breed would be better off with English
Pointers; a breed that here is radically different than the Pointers of
"the old country". It's the height of hypocrisy.
JMO,
Dave
Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for
Hotmail®. N:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_express:082009"
target="_new">Try it now.
|
|
|
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 08/07/2009 3:13 PM |
|
In a message dated 8/7/2009 4:46:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
RoggenfeldGSPs@myfairpoint.net writes:
Unfortunately the genetics people will have a very hard time developing
a test to distinguish between pure GSPs and GSPs crossbred with Pointers for a
bigger run, because Pointers are a part of the very early foundations of the
development of GSPs, so some of the genetic material from them is still in our
breed.
Does anyone know if this is actually the case? Pretty much
every breed is a composition of foundation breeds. That doesn't mean we
can't tell them apart genetically. Can they distinguish between GSPs and
Foxhounds or Spanish Pointers? They were also used to found the
breed. Does anyone have data on this? If not, I will contact the
people who market the DNA test and see what they say.
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
Dave Quindt
 SH Posts:41

 |
| 08/07/2009 3:34 PM |
|
|
Pam Parshall wrote:
"I agree that they are radically different, but that is because of what breeders in this country did to them, not what the English did. (Think American Field.) "
Pam,
If you were to spend 6 months hunting across the country; starting in Montana in Sept for sharpies, working your way south, east and west, hunting the grouse woods of WI and the piney woods of the southeastern bobwhite and the CRP fields of Kansas and ending up in AZ for scalies, would you be better off with a Pointer bred from American lines or a Pointer imported from England?
What "breeders in this country did to them" is EXACTLY what breeders of working dogs SHOULD do; change the dog to fit the needs of the sportsman. Seems perfectly logical to me.
JMO,
Dave
Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try Bing now.
|
|
|
|
|
stormwynd
Posts:6

 |
| 08/07/2009 3:35 PM |
|
Well perhaps that means that pointers as well as GSP have been radically changed for field performance here than they were meant to be in the 'Old Country" There is probably a host of other breeds that fit this bill as well. Sometimes change is not for the better and goes further than intended. Sometimes it is wise to admit that mistakes may have been made and then try to fix them instead of rationalizing them. It doesn't take a whole lot of thought to see the differences in breed type between what the general population calls show stock and field stock. My personal opinion is the show stock shows much more resemblance to their ancestry and just because GSP's were bred for hunting does not mean they cannot compete in breed,agility,obedience as well. All of todays breeds were started with a specific reason or focus but society has advanced (thank goodness we no longer live in caves) and some of those requirements are no longer in existance. Does that mean we should stop breeding Dobermans, Rotties, herding dogs and yes hunting dogs? No!!!! That means we as breeders can just accomplish other things with our dogs while still trying to preserve breed type.
Vicki Eells
stormwynd |
|
|
|
|
CathyYak
 MH Posts:963


 |
| 08/07/2009 4:03 PM |
|
In a message dated 8/7/2009 5:19:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
dlquindt@hotmail.com writes:
What
"breeders in this country did to them" is EXACTLY what breeders of working
dogs SHOULD do; change the dog to fit the needs of the sportsman.
Seems perfectly logical to me.
Sportsmen didn't change the GSP to hunt better. Traillers
changed it to trial better. That is not at all the same thing.
Flame suit on.
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli Claddagh Kennels Long Island, New York |
|
|
Dave Quindt
 SH Posts:41

 |
| 08/07/2009 4:09 PM |
|
|
Cathy Iacopelli wrote:
"Are you saying that the founders of the two breeds (English Pointer and the German Shorthaired Pointer) bred them to hunt the same way? Because one of the most important words in our standard "versatile" does not appear anywhere in the Pointer standard. They are specialists. Or are you saying we have not changed the hunting/running style of what it was when the breed came to this country?"
No, I am saying it's hypocritical to tell someone if they want a dog to hunt in a manner different from the way we think GSPs hunted in Europe decades ago they should buy a Pointer, which is also a breed in the US that's radically different from the original dog from England.
Apparently it's OK that the Pointer has evolved but not ok that the GSP has evolved? The Labrador Retriever is the most used hunting dog in the US, yet that's a breed that was developed not as a sporting dog but a working dog. Somehow that's not a problem but hunting a GSP off of horseback or wheeler or truck in the desert or the mesquite of south Texas is some horrible bastardization of the use of the breed?
Our perceptions of how dogs are hunted in Europe, both today and when these breeds were developed, is so far from accurate it's not even funny. If you only hunt your dogs on upland game here in the US, you are using your dog in a RADICALLY different manner than the average GSP in Germany. Upland bird hunting is not, and has never been, the primary use of the GSP in Germany. The average GSP in Germany is used for game other than upland birds far more than on upland birds; in fact a rather healthy % of GSPs in Germany will be hunted over 50 days a year, and never see a upland bird!
This concept of the "close working, easy going GSP in Germany" is a bunch of B.S. They breed those dogs to have the heart and desire to chase down wounded big game and to corner and pin wild hogs 4 times their size! Give me a dog with that much raw desire, and I can show you a dog that's going to RIP IT UP in the field. The hunting style of the German hunter is such where they desire a dog under control when used as a birddog in the field. That windshield wiper pattern that the Germans want their dogs to run when hunted in those beet fields is more training than breeding. The concept of the “close working European hunting dog” is pretty absurd considering their walking trials look for dogs to make casts up to 500 meters. In many of the European walking trials, those dogs run bigger than what would be acceptable in American walking trials.
I've seen registered DKs, imported from Germany, who had enough run for horseback trials without any training or development! Let me pick 20 registered DKs from Germany, and I'll get you dogs running All Age, and producing All Age prospects, in under 3 generations. Having said that, I have no interest in doing so because I don't want to deal with the personality, temperament and trainability issues that come along with those imports.
JMO,
Dave
Get your vacation photos on your phone! Click here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.7
|
You must be logged in to use this module.
|
 |
Membership: |
 |
Latest:
CliffBaill |
 |
New Today:
0 |
 |
New Yesterday:
0 |
 |
Overall:
3204 |
 |
People Online: |
 |
Visitors:
121 |
 |
Members:
0 |
 |
Total:
121 |
Online Now:
|
|
|
|
|